“…In humans, Doppler ultrasound has been the standard modality for this purpose; 10 yet it often yields incomplete or inaccurate hemodynamic data due to the limited size of acoustic windows, which can be compounded by overlying gas-filled bowels, 11 observer variability, 12 the difficulty of visualizing complex PV branches, 11 and the inability to measure three-dimensionally-variable flow using a 2D scanning technique. In small animals, flow meters, [13][14][15] lase specs, 16 and microspheres, 17,18 have been used to evaluate PV flow, but these modalities are too invasive to be used repeatedly, and the flow velocity data they provide is insufficiently detailed. Alternatively, several studies have used MRI to evaluate PV flow in humans and rodents, 19,20 concluding that MRI offers several advantages over the aforementioned modalities, including noninvasiveness, objectivity as opposed to examiner dependence, and a three-dimensional scanning area.…”