InsuOnline, an Electronic Game for Medical Education on Insulin Therapy: A Randomized Controlled Trial With Primary Care Physicians

Abstract

BackgroundMost patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) are followed by primary care physicians, who often lack knowledge or confidence to prescribe insulin properly. This contributes to clinical inertia and poor glycemic control. Effectiveness of traditional continuing medical education (CME) to solve that is limited, so new approaches are required. Electronic games are a good option, as they can be very effective and easily disseminated.ObjectiveThe objective of our study was to assess applicability, user acceptance, and educational effectiveness of InsuOnline, an electronic serious game for medical education on insulin therapy for DM, compared with a traditional CME activity.MethodsPrimary care physicians (PCPs) from South of Brazil were invited by phone or email to participate in an unblinded randomized controlled trial and randomly allocated to play the game InsuOnline, installed as an app in their own computers, at the time of their choice, with minimal or no external guidance, or to participate in a traditional CME session, composed by onsite lectures and cases discussion. Both interventions had the same content and duration (~4 h). Applicability was assessed by the number of subjects who completed the assigned intervention in each group. Insulin-prescribing competence (factual knowledge, problem-solving skills, and attitudes) was self-assessed through a questionnaire applied before, immediately after, and 3 months after the interventions. Acceptance of the intervention (satisfaction and perceived importance for clinical practice) was also assessed immediately after and 3 months after the interventions, respectively.ResultsSubjects’ characteristics were similar between groups (mean age 38, 51.4% [69/134] male). In the game group, 69 of 88 (78%) completed the intervention, compared with 65 of 73 (89%) in the control group, with no difference in applicability. Percentage of right answers in the competence subscale, which was 52% at the baseline in both groups, significantly improved immediately after both interventions to 92% in the game group and to 85% in control (P<.001). After 3 months, it remained significantly higher than that at the baseline in both groups (80% in game, and 76% in control; P<.001). Absolute increase in competence score was better with the game (40%) than with traditional CME (34%; P=.01). Insulin-related attitudes were improved both after the game (significant improvement in 4 of 9 items) and after control activity (3 of 9). Both interventions were very well accepted, with most subjects rating them as “fun or pleasant,” “useful,” and “practice-changing.”ConclusionsThe game InsuOnline was applicable, very well accepted, and highly effective for medical education on insulin therapy. In view of its flexibility and easy dissemination, it is a valid option for large-scale CME, potentially helping to reduce clinical inertia and to improve quality of care for DM patients.Trial RegistrationClinicaltrials.gov NCT001759953; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01759953 (Archived by WebCite at htt...

Development and Evaluation of a New Serious Game for Continuing Medical Education of General Practitioners (Hygie): Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial

“…No significant difference was found on the final questionnaire score, which is consistent with a previous study [20] and may suggest that journal article reading can still lead to sufficient knowledge for continuing education but that Hygie is at least noninferior to traditional methods.…”

“…Finally, it is unique because of its extensive evaluation among a significant number of GPs from several regions of France. The use of both a double-blinded randomized trial and a satisfaction questionnaire evaluation differentiates Hygie from other serious health games in existence, with a few exceptions such as InsuOnline [20]. Our study shows that it is feasible to create an engaging educational video game, including validation in a randomized trial, without influence of public or private financing.…”

“…Few serious games have been developed with the goal of facilitating continuous medical education for health professionals [18] and GPs [19,20]. To our knowledge, no existing game covers several topics related to family medicine.…”

Effective Behavioral Changes through a Digital mHealth App: Exploring the Impact of Hedonic Well-Being, Psychological Empowerment and Inspiration (Preprint)

“…It is worth noting that individuals proactively seek play, something that gamified experiences theoretically automate [9][10][11]. With the advent of digital multimedia and resulting virtual worlds, there has been a surge in multidisciplinary interest in the short-term and longer-term applications of gamification [12][13][14][15].…”

Courting Apocalypse: Creating a Zombie-Themed Evidence-Based Medicine Game

“…4 Within the medical education curriculum, gaming has become increasingly more established as projects have been designed and validated by research. At a training center at Heidelberg University, medical students between their third and sixth year participated in a game intended to provide instruction on correct chest tube insertion, 5 which has recently been the subject of a randomized controlled trial.…”