2002
DOI: 10.1007/s00291-002-0094-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Insurance demand and the elasticity of risk aversion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This approach has been widely used in literature including Battermann et al [19], Broll et al [20], Alghalith, et al [21] [22]. In this paper, we extend their work by analyzing the impact of joint energy price and output price uncertainties on the demands for energy and the other non-risky inputs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This approach has been widely used in literature including Battermann et al [19], Broll et al [20], Alghalith, et al [21] [22]. In this paper, we extend their work by analyzing the impact of joint energy price and output price uncertainties on the demands for energy and the other non-risky inputs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Wagener [29], and Eichner and Wagener [18] [30] carried out some compara- 1 See, for example, Battermann, Broll and Wahl [19], Broll, Wahl and Wong [20], Wong and Ma [17], and Eichner and Wagener [24].…”
Section: The Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Before analyzing the economic impact of divergence upon the optimal investment ratio, we introduce the concept of risk aversion elasticity (Battermann, Broll and Wahl 2002, Broll, Wahl and Wong 2006, Eichner and Wagener 2003.…”
Section: Locational Effects Of Integrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Again this condition -which originally was derived in Battermann et al (2002) and Broll et al (2006) -has an EU-analogue, viz. that the index of partial relative risk prudence, R 2 (a, y − a) = −(y − a) u ′′′ (y) u ′′ (y) (again cf.…”
Section: Changes In the Direct Riskmentioning
confidence: 99%