2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.07.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Insurance Type and Solid Organ Transplantation Outcomes: A Historical Perspective on How Medicaid Expansion Might Impact Transplantation Outcomes

Abstract: Background The number of Medicaid beneficiaries has increased under the Affordable Care Act (ACA), improving access to solid organ transplantation in this disadvantaged patient cohort. It is unclear what impact Medicaid expansion will have on transplant outcomes. We performed a retrospective cohort analysis to measure the frequency and variation in Medicaid transplantation, and post-transplant survival in Medicaid patients. Study Design Adult heart, lung, liver, and renal transplant recipients between 2002 a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
42
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
6
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a retrospective review of United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) data, DuBay et al found that patients with Medicaid received fewer HT than expected and were listed with more severe organ failure, suggesting listing at a later stage of illness. 13 Studies of other solid organ transplants have shown clear differences in access by insurance type. Patients with public insurance are less likely to be evaluated or listed for kidney and liver transplant 17,18,19 Although a similar proportion of patients with Medicaid and Medicare insurance were listed for HT in our cohort, the proportion was less than that of patients with private insurance, and the reasons patients were ineligible differed according to insurance type.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a retrospective review of United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) data, DuBay et al found that patients with Medicaid received fewer HT than expected and were listed with more severe organ failure, suggesting listing at a later stage of illness. 13 Studies of other solid organ transplants have shown clear differences in access by insurance type. Patients with public insurance are less likely to be evaluated or listed for kidney and liver transplant 17,18,19 Although a similar proportion of patients with Medicaid and Medicare insurance were listed for HT in our cohort, the proportion was less than that of patients with private insurance, and the reasons patients were ineligible differed according to insurance type.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1013 Prior data has confirmed that very few uninsured or underinsured patients receive HT in the United States (US), as most HT programs require adequate insurance coverage and financial resources to list patients for transplantation. 14,15 Currently, little data exists on the impact that insurance has on outcomes after LVAD.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dubay et al . reported no differences in waiting time for Medicaid recipients when compared with Medicare and private insurees, once listed. It is, thus, a worthwhile consideration to go further and evaluate barriers to listing as well as those most likely to be encountered immediately following listing as these might serve to stall the pathway to transplantation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[5][6][7][8] Previous studies in heart transplantation have demonstrated higher mortality, decreased graft survival, and higher rates of rejection for recipients receiving heart transplants with Medicare or Medicaid health insurance coverage compared with those with private health insurance. [5][6][7][8] This finding is not unique to heart transplantation, and previous studies have demonstrated that outcomes for other solid organ transplants, including lung, 9 liver, 10 and kidney, 11 are inferior when transplant recipients with public health insurance are compared with transplant recipients with private health insurance coverage.…”
Section: Article See P 576mentioning
confidence: 99%