2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101351
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Insuring against climatic shocks: Evidence on farm households’ willingness to pay for rainfall insurance product in rural India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
4
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…An increase in farmers' knowledge of agricultural insurance by one unit increases willingness to pay by Ksh 8,392. These results are consistent with [2,16,29] who found a positive and significant association between WTP and awareness in Northern Ghana, Burkina Faso and Cuttack district, respectively. However, the results contradict [29], who found a significant and negative relationship in Bolangir district.…”
Section: Variables Probit Modelsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An increase in farmers' knowledge of agricultural insurance by one unit increases willingness to pay by Ksh 8,392. These results are consistent with [2,16,29] who found a positive and significant association between WTP and awareness in Northern Ghana, Burkina Faso and Cuttack district, respectively. However, the results contradict [29], who found a significant and negative relationship in Bolangir district.…”
Section: Variables Probit Modelsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The results are consistent with [2,16,26] found farm size had a positive and significant influence on willingness to pay for crop insurance. However, the results contradict [29], who revealed that farm size negatively influences WTI and WTP amounts for rainfall insurance products in rural India.…”
Section: Variables Probit Modelcontrasting
confidence: 70%
“…Farm households are sensitive to idiosyncratic shocks like disease or yield loss due to poor soil quality and 'covariate shocks' like flooding, drought, or natural calamities. According to Senapati (2020), rural families are vulnerable to both idiosyncratic shocks, such as injuries, disease or yield loss, fire or theft experienced by a single household, and covariate shocks, such as flood, drought, or natural catastrophe encountered by all households in a particular area.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to basis risk, these studies have found that factors affecting levels of risk aversion, such as income and prior familiarity with weather derivatives, also influence willingness-to-pay. More recently, prior experience with extreme weather events has been found to contribute positively to willingness-to-pay for weather derivatives (Liu et al, 2019; Senapati, 2020). Hence, increased volatility and occurrence of extreme weather events associated with climate change can have a significant impact on viticulture (Jones et al, 2022; Ashenfelter and Storchmann, 2016; Van Leeuwen and Darriet, 2016), and the growing awareness on the part of producers (Demberger, 2017; Mercer, 2018) may ultimately contribute to a greater usage of weather contracts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%