2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2015.10.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Insuring health or insuring wealth? An experimental evaluation of health insurance in rural Cambodia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
56
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
6
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Eligible households can purposefully select their household members to be insured and pay the insurance premium only for them. [21][22][23][24][25] This adverse selection could lead to the situation that the people insured are more likely to be in need of health care. Therefore, a key target in the National health financing strategy to move towards universal health coverage is to make enrolment mandatory and the health financing system more centralized in Senegal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eligible households can purposefully select their household members to be insured and pay the insurance premium only for them. [21][22][23][24][25] This adverse selection could lead to the situation that the people insured are more likely to be in need of health care. Therefore, a key target in the National health financing strategy to move towards universal health coverage is to make enrolment mandatory and the health financing system more centralized in Senegal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous evaluations of the impacts of micro health insurance policies have described effects along these lines: De Bock and Ontiveros (2013), in their review of the impact of microinsurance, highlighted that most studies on health insurance have found significant decreases in out-of-pocket expenses of subscribers. Levine and Polimeni (2012) and Aggarwal (2010) (among others) also found that insured households were less likely to sell assets or take up informal loans after a health shock. We know of only one other study on the effects of index insurance on ex-post risk-coping strategies: Janzen and Carter (2013) found that in a drought-affected region of Kenya, pastoralists who subscribed to an index-based insurance policy were significantly less likely to report anticipating having to sell livestock or reduce consumption as a response to weather shocks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Consistent with the pattern that idiosyncratic health shocks are better insured by informal risksharing networks than covariate weather shocks to agricultural production (Townsend, 1994;Udry, 1994), health insurance take-up and the potential of subsidization have been found to be even lower in several middle-income country contexts (Thornton et al, 2010;Capuno et al, 2016;Levine et al, 2016;Wagstaff et al, 2016). 2…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…There is some evidence for selection on risk in that demand of ill individuals is more price-sensitive (the opposite of adverse selection in the sense of Rothschild and Stiglitz, 1976). Two further papers, Levine et al (2016) and Thornton et al (2010) mention similar effects of subsidization on enrollment among a subgroup of self-selected households in rural Cambodia and urban informal workers in Nicaragua, respectively. Their primary focus is on health care facility utilization and health-related household expenditures, however.…”
Section: The Intervention: Targeted Subsidized Health Insurancementioning
confidence: 99%