2017
DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-5029-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrability from point symmetries in a family of cosmological Horndeski Lagrangians

Abstract: For a family of Horndeski theories, formulated in terms of a generalized Galileon model, we study the integrability of the field equations in a Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker space-time. We are interested in point transformations which leave invariant the field equations. Noether's theorem is applied to determine the conservation laws for a family of models that belong to the same general class. The cosmological scenarios with or without an extra perfect fluid with constant equation of state parameter are… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We note that the canonical scalar field models are more informative compared to the non-canonical scalar field models. The physics of canonical scalar field models, which is mostly contained in the potential, V (φ(t)) where φ(t) is the underlying field, have gained a considerable interest in the cosmological community due to explaining various stages of the universe evolution, see [30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57] (also see [58,59,60,61,62]). The selection of quintessence scalar field models should not be much arbitrary, according to recently introduced swampland [63,64] and refined swampland [65] criteria.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We note that the canonical scalar field models are more informative compared to the non-canonical scalar field models. The physics of canonical scalar field models, which is mostly contained in the potential, V (φ(t)) where φ(t) is the underlying field, have gained a considerable interest in the cosmological community due to explaining various stages of the universe evolution, see [30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57] (also see [58,59,60,61,62]). The selection of quintessence scalar field models should not be much arbitrary, according to recently introduced swampland [63,64] and refined swampland [65] criteria.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Noether Symmetry Approach is outlined in [3] and in [2]. Applications to scalar-tensor cosmologies are reported in [4,5,6,7]. The most general scalar-tensor theory, giving second order field equations, the so-called Horndeski gravity, is discussed in [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the following we assume that g (φ) is not constant or zero. It is important to mentioned that the analysis we perform here it is different from the one which presented in [50]. The main reason is that in this work we see the Lagrangian as a regular system in contrary to [50] which we saw it as a singular system.…”
Section: Symmetry Analysismentioning
confidence: 72%
“…It is important to mentioned that the analysis we perform here it is different from the one which presented in [50]. The main reason is that in this work we see the Lagrangian as a regular system in contrary to [50] which we saw it as a singular system. The two different approaches are complementary, for details see the discussion in [60,61].…”
Section: Symmetry Analysismentioning
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation