2022
DOI: 10.1088/1751-8121/ac4a1e
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrable deformations of sigma models

Abstract: In this pedagogical review we introduce systematic approaches to deforming integrable 2-dimensional sigma models. We use the integrable principal chiral model and the conformal Wess-Zumino-Witten model as our starting points and explore their Yang-Baxter and current-current deformations. There is an intricate web of relations between these models based on underlying algebraic structures and worldsheet dualities, which is highlighted throughout. We finish with a discussion of the generalisation to other symmetr… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
70
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 179 publications
2
70
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The case of the supercoset is formally identical. We now consider a real Lie supergroup G whose algebra admits the Z 4 grading g = g (0) + g (1) + g (2) + g (3) so that [[g (i) , g (j) ]] ⊂ g (i+j mod 4) , where [[ , ]] is the superbracket (that coincides with the anti-commutator when both g (i) , g (j) have odd grading, and the commutator otherwise). Notice that if x, y belong to the Grassmann enveloping algebra of g, then the bracket that must be used is always given by the standard commutator [x, y], because the Grassmann variables take care of the additional minus signs.…”
Section: Deformed/twisted (Super)coset Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The case of the supercoset is formally identical. We now consider a real Lie supergroup G whose algebra admits the Z 4 grading g = g (0) + g (1) + g (2) + g (3) so that [[g (i) , g (j) ]] ⊂ g (i+j mod 4) , where [[ , ]] is the superbracket (that coincides with the anti-commutator when both g (i) , g (j) have odd grading, and the commutator otherwise). Notice that if x, y belong to the Grassmann enveloping algebra of g, then the bracket that must be used is always given by the standard commutator [x, y], because the Grassmann variables take care of the additional minus signs.…”
Section: Deformed/twisted (Super)coset Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notice that if x, y belong to the Grassmann enveloping algebra of g, then the bracket that must be used is always given by the standard commutator [x, y], because the Grassmann variables take care of the additional minus signs. If we identify H with the Lie group of h = g (0) , then the action of the σ-model on the supercoset G \ H is still given by (3.35), with the exception that now d = 1 2 P (1) + P (2) − 1 2 P (3) and that the trace should be substituted by the supertrace [71]. With these minor substitutions, the hYB deformation of the supercoset action is still given by (3.36) [9], and the Lax connection is the obvious generalisation of the supercoset Lax connection…”
Section: Deformed/twisted (Super)coset Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally, let us mention that integrability is not restricted to symmetric spaces. Recently there has been a lot of activity in the construction of integrable NLSMs [9][10][11][12][13], see also [14,15] and references therein.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such deformations are of interest, since they reduce the amount of supersymmetry while retaining integrability, allowing for a more general study of the AdS/CFT correspondence beyond N = 4 SYM [27][28][29], see also [30] for an elaborate list of references. Nevertheless, even in the bosonic setting integrable deformations of two-dimensional σ-models have received much attention [31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43] and a vast web of connections and dualities between them has been uncovered over the years [44][45][46][47][48], see also [49][50][51] for recent reviews.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%