2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2007.07.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrable spin–boson models descending from rational six-vertex models

Abstract: We construct commuting transfer matrices for models describing the interaction between a single quantum spin and a single bosonic mode using the quantum inverse scattering framework. The transfer matrices are obtained from certain inhomogeneous rational vertex models combining bosonic and spin representations of SU (2), subject to non-diagonal toroidal and open boundary conditions. Only open boundary conditions are found to lead to integrable Hamiltonians combining both rotating and counter-rotating terms in t… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
39
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When ǫ = 0, the Hamiltonian enjoys a discrete Z 2 symmetry meaning that the parity of bosonic and spin excitations is conserved. Several attempts of solving these type of models were tried employing Bethe ansatz and Quantum Inverse Scattering techniques [8,9]. The isotropic Rabi model corresponding to θ = 0 and λ = 1 was solved exactly in a seminal paper by Braak [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When ǫ = 0, the Hamiltonian enjoys a discrete Z 2 symmetry meaning that the parity of bosonic and spin excitations is conserved. Several attempts of solving these type of models were tried employing Bethe ansatz and Quantum Inverse Scattering techniques [8,9]. The isotropic Rabi model corresponding to θ = 0 and λ = 1 was solved exactly in a seminal paper by Braak [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“….., N} are nonzero, which just prove the validity of the induction. Finally, by using the identities: 32) and remarking that A − (λ) has the following functional dependence w.r.t. λ:…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to study the general representations and boundary conditions we have to go beyond traditional methods which do not apply for these general settings. This is done by developing the Sklyanin's SoV method [84][85][86][87] for this class of models, a method that has the advantage to lead (mainly by construction) to the complete characterization of the spectrum (eigenvalues and eigenvectors) and has proven to be applicable for a large variety of integrable quantum models [28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][88][89][90][91][92][93][94][95][96][97][98][99][100][101][102], where traditional methods fail. Moreover, the SoV approach has the advantage to allow also for the study of the dynamics of the models as it leads to universal determinant formulae for matrix elements of local operators on transfer matrix eigenstates as shown for different classes of models, first in [97], and then in many other cases in [33,88,89,99,100,103].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The theory of these equations initiated by Riemann and Fuchs [18] can now be applied to (11). First, one obtains with the definition ψ(z) = φ 1 (z) and ψ(−z) = φ 2 (z) the coupled local system,…”
Section: The Quantum Rabi Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%