Integración de criterios medioambientales en procesos de decisión : una aproximación multicriterio a la planificación integrada de recursos eléctricos

Abstract

Una vez cumplido el objetivo de terminar esta tesis doctoral, me gustaría agradecer a mucha gente el haberme ayudado a conseguirlo.En primer lugar, y ante todo, quiero agradecer a mi director de tesis, Carlos Romero, todo el esfuerzo desinteresado que ha puesto en ayudarme a plantear y realizar este trabajo. Sin él, no hubiera podido realizar esta tesis, ni posiblemente ninguna otra. También, por la parte que les toca, a Inés Mínguez y a Ramón Alonso, por ponerme en contacto con Carlos, y por meterme el gusanillo de hacer el doctorado.

Multiple Criteria Decision-Making as an Operational Conceptualization of Energy Sustainability

“…It is interesting to note that the WS side of the proposed framework presented here is in line with that proposed by Hediger [60]. Not surprisingly, the multi-criteria framework based on Compromise Programming has a direct interpretation as a function of social utility [61].…”

“…This will be the way through which human preferences can be incorporated into the framework. To obtain them, techniques such as AHP based on standardized stakeholder surveys [61] or Munda's SMCDM maninly based on NAIADE techniques [18] can be very useful.…”

“…In the case of this application, firstly, following AHP, stakeholders were asked to express the relative importance they give to each criterion by comparing them in pairs. This was done through ad hoc online questionnaires in which they could express themselves in terms such as: criterion A is moderately more important than criterion B, or criterion B is extremely more important than criterion C. These expressions were then translated into numbers, using a scale designed by Saaty [61]. Thus, the relative preferences of each hierarchical level were obtained.…”