2006
DOI: 10.1007/0-8176-4481-4_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integral Invariants and Shape Matching

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
103
0
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
103
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…These method are simple and robust, but less ability to distinguish, and can't be used for precise matching. The more ability of description methods are Fourier method, wavelet description method, measuring distance [1], shape context [2] [3], integral invariants [4], Heat Kernel [5].…”
Section: A Component-stroke Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These method are simple and robust, but less ability to distinguish, and can't be used for precise matching. The more ability of description methods are Fourier method, wavelet description method, measuring distance [1], shape context [2] [3], integral invariants [4], Heat Kernel [5].…”
Section: A Component-stroke Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We employed the MCFs for the 10-DS, SC, and mixture of vMDs to calculate the dissimilarity in (3). In addition, for reference purposes, we compared all the above descriptors and the integral invariant (INI) descriptor [11]. This comparison examines the differences between matching methods for ordered and unordered shapes.…”
Section: Drawing Data Setmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…image retrieval, object classification, object recognition, object identification, etc). Different mathematical tools have been used to define the shape descriptors: algebraic invariants [14], Fourier analysis [6], morphological operations [26], integral transformations [23], statistical methods [17], fractal techniques [15], logic [27], combinatorial methods [1], multiscale approaches [9], integral invariants [16], multi-scale integral geometry [3,4,18], etc. Generally speaking, shape descriptors can be classified into two groups: area based descriptors and boundary based ones.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature so far, more attention has been paid to the area based descriptors, not only because of their robustness but also because they are easier to be efficiently estimated when working with discrete data. Due to the recent proliferation of image verification, identification and recognition systems there is a strong demand for shape properties that can be derived from their boundaries [16,19,30]. It is worth mentioning that some objects, like human signatures for example, are open curves by their nature and area based descriptors cannot be used for their analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%