2016
DOI: 10.12732/ijpam.v108i1.15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integral Oscillation Criteria for Third-Order Differential Equations With Delay Argument

Abstract: In the present paper, some new criteria for property A and the oscillation of third order nonlinear delay differential equations of the typeare established.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 13 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We first present the following classes of nonoscillatory (let us say positive) solutions of (1.1): z(t) ∈ N I ⇔ z (t) > 0, z (t) > 0, (r(t)(z (t)) α ) < 0, z(t) ∈ N II ⇔ z (t) < 0, z (t) > 0, (r(t)(z (t)) α ) < 0, and z(t) ∈ N III ⇔ z (t) > 0, z (t) < 0, (r(t)(z (t)) α ) < 0, eventually. The following lemma comes directly from combining Lemma 1 and Lemma 2 in [13] with Lemma 3 and Lemma 4 in [20]. Proof See [21, p. 28].…”
Section: Some Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We first present the following classes of nonoscillatory (let us say positive) solutions of (1.1): z(t) ∈ N I ⇔ z (t) > 0, z (t) > 0, (r(t)(z (t)) α ) < 0, z(t) ∈ N II ⇔ z (t) < 0, z (t) > 0, (r(t)(z (t)) α ) < 0, and z(t) ∈ N III ⇔ z (t) > 0, z (t) < 0, (r(t)(z (t)) α ) < 0, eventually. The following lemma comes directly from combining Lemma 1 and Lemma 2 in [13] with Lemma 3 and Lemma 4 in [20]. Proof See [21, p. 28].…”
Section: Some Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%