2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2010.03836.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrated analysis of preclinical data to support the design of the first in man study of LY2181308, a second generation antisense oligonucleotide

Abstract: WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS SUBJECT • The plasma pharmacokinetics (PK) of second generation antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs) are fairly well understood with well conserved pharmacokinetic properties across species, moderate clearance and extensive volume of distribution. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS • The tissue distribution and exposure and the pharmacodynamic (PD) or target inhibition following ASO administration are not yet well understood leading to still fairly empiric early clinical development strategi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The transition from part A to part B was planned on the basis of either development of toxicity or evidence from PK that the predicted biological effective dose (BED) had been reached. The recommended dose for phase 2 studies was determined from both DLT and the reduction in survivin expression in tumor tissue at the anticipated BED as defined by the preclinical PK/PD model of Callies et al (10). At the recommended phase 2 dose, 2 companion studies were conducted at the Universities of Oxford (study 1, endobronchial tumor sampling) and Manchester (study 2, […”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The transition from part A to part B was planned on the basis of either development of toxicity or evidence from PK that the predicted biological effective dose (BED) had been reached. The recommended dose for phase 2 studies was determined from both DLT and the reduction in survivin expression in tumor tissue at the anticipated BED as defined by the preclinical PK/PD model of Callies et al (10). At the recommended phase 2 dose, 2 companion studies were conducted at the Universities of Oxford (study 1, endobronchial tumor sampling) and Manchester (study 2, […”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with phosphorothioate or first-generation ASOs, second-generation ASOs are more stable, have an improved pharmacokinetic (PK) profile, increased potency, and reduced toxicity (9). Using aggregate data from preclinical pharmacology and toxicology, an integrated PK/PD (pharmacodynamic) model was developed to predict a biologically effective dose range for clinical evaluation (10). On the basis of this, a firstin-human dose (FHD) study was designed to evaluate the biodistribution profile of LY2181308 by measuring the following tumor-specific PD changes: tumor tissue penetration of LY2181308, downregulation of tumor survivin at the mRNA, and protein levels and restoration of tumor apoptosis at a dose and schedule that was safe in humans.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An added advantage in the use of gataparsen is its high drug retention capacity in the host which goes up to 21 days. The distribution of this drug in animal tissues is rapid and the levels of drug elimination are low-to-moderate [86]. Analysis of plasma samples collected from patients showed that the primary sites of uptake of gataparsen were the renal and hepatic tissues and the elimination time of the drug was close to 31 h with a half-life of 12 h [87].…”
Section: Synthesis Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics Of Gataparsenmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Thereafter, PK assessment samples were taken every fourth week starting on Visit 3, Day 57 (prior to LY2181308 infusion) and at the follow up visit 21 days after patients had taken their last dose of study drug. Mean population plasma LY2181308 PK parameters (clearance, exposure, volume of distribution, half-lives) and subject variability were computed using non-linear mixed effect modeling [15] (implemented in NONMEM®, ICON corporation, Ellicott City, MD, version VI).VI In addition, LY2181308 PK parameters (maximum concentration [Cmax], area under the curve [AUC], and clearance [Cl]) were determined by standard non-compartmental methods of analysis using WinNonlin ® Professional Edition version 5.2 (Pharsight Corporation, Mountain View, CA).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%