2016
DOI: 10.1109/tdei.2016.005301
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrated ANN-based proactive fault diagnostic scheme for power transformers using dissolved gas analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
89
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 148 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
89
0
Order By: Relevance
“…while t ≤ Max Iter do for each Wolf i ∈ pack do Update current wolf's position according to Equation (15). end -Update a, A, and C as in Equations (16), (11) and (12).…”
Section: Algorithm 1 Gwo Pseudo-codementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…while t ≤ Max Iter do for each Wolf i ∈ pack do Update current wolf's position according to Equation (15). end -Update a, A, and C as in Equations (16), (11) and (12).…”
Section: Algorithm 1 Gwo Pseudo-codementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Energies 2019, 12, 4170 2 of 18 DGA interpretation methods [1], including key gas method [2,3], IEC three-ratio method [4,5], Duval triangle method [6], Rogers ratio method [7] and Dornenburg ratio method [8], Duval pentagon [9], Mansour pentagon method [10,11], etc., are available to identify the different types of faults occurring in operating transformers. Although the commonly used methods are simple and effective in transformer fault diagnosis, they suffer from defects such as coding deficiencies, excessive coding boundaries and critical value criterion defects, which will affect the reliability of fault analysis [12].With the development of artificial intelligence (AI), machine learning and pattern recognition methods have been widely used in power transformer fault diagnosis, including artificial neural network (ANN) [13][14][15], support vector machine (SVM) [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24], probabilistic neural network [25,26], Bayesian neural network [27], fuzzy logic [28][29][30], deep belief network [31], expert system [32,33], which make up for the shortcomings of the traditional DGA methods, directly or indirectly improve the accuracy of transformer fault diagnosis, and provide a new idea for high-precision transformer fault diagnosis. Although these methods have achieved good results, there are also some shortcomings.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these traditional methods may have problems such as missing coding and too absolute coding boundaries. With the development of artificial intelligence technology, artificial neural network (ANN) [7], Bayes network [8], support vector machine (SVM) [9], and other intelligent methods have emerged, which improve the diagnostic accuracy of transformer fault. SVM is a new machine learning method based on the development of statistical learning theory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, due to the complexity of the working environment and the process structure of the transformers, these methods are not enough to make a right judgement and cannot judge fault fuzzy boundary. According to [6], their accuracy rates are about in 60%, which means the ratio methods cannot account for the diagnostic criteria completely [7]. In addition, the concentrations of cellulose chemical markers in oil, such as methanol, ethanol and 2-furfural, are used as a determination mark for diagnosing transformer insulation failure, which still present many challenges for an accurate interpretation in real transformers [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%