2015
DOI: 10.2514/1.c032957
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrated Arrival- and Departure-Schedule Optimization Under Uncertainty

Abstract: In terminal airspace, integrating arrivals and departures with shared waypoints provides the potential of improving operational efficiency by allowing direct routes when possible. Incorporating stochastic evaluation as a post-analysis process of deterministic optimization, and imposing a safety buffer in deterministic optimization, are two ways to learn and alleviate the impact of uncertainty and to avoid unexpected outcomes. This work presents a third and direct way to take uncertainty into consideration duri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Including uncertainty in future work will be important and necessary in order to handle departure time and weather impacts precisely. Since GA-type optimization can be parallelized and combined with Graphics Processing Unites (GPU) implementation [8], the proposed approach will enable the introduction of uncertainties in future research, where uncertainties can be injected to route options in terms of their corresponding look-ahead times.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Including uncertainty in future work will be important and necessary in order to handle departure time and weather impacts precisely. Since GA-type optimization can be parallelized and combined with Graphics Processing Unites (GPU) implementation [8], the proposed approach will enable the introduction of uncertainties in future research, where uncertainties can be injected to route options in terms of their corresponding look-ahead times.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The details of the parameterization can be found in Hartjes and Visser [19]. Two noise-exposed regions of 66 km × 59 km and 36.5 km × 20 km with a population grid cell size of 500 m × 500 m [33] are used for the SPIJKERBOOR2K and ARNEM2N SIDs, respectively. A Boeing 737-800 with two engines is used as the aircraft model, based on the Base of Aircraft Data (BADA), with an initial mass of 68 tons (85% of the maximum take-off weight) as a representative take-off mass.…”
Section: Numerical Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stochastic scheduler combines NSGA and Monte Carlo simulation. 13,16,17,28 The decision variables including speeds, routes, delays, and runway assignment are coded as "genes", and each solution with a set of decision variables is marked as an "individual". In NSGA, a population with hundreds of "individuals" evolves at each generation in terms of their costs through operations of "crossover", "mutation", "ranking", and "selection".…”
Section: G Algorithms and Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a Linux platform with 18x2.5 GHz Xeon, 32 GB memory, and two GeForce GTX690 GPUs, a 15-flight scenario scheduling problem takes around 30 seconds to be solved . 28,29…”
Section: G Algorithms and Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%