2018
DOI: 10.1002/2017ef000724
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrated Assessment of Carbon Dioxide Removal

Abstract: To maintain the chance of keeping the average global temperature increase below 2°C and to limit long‐term climate change, removing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere (carbon dioxide removal, CDR) is becoming increasingly necessary. We analyze optimal and cost‐effective climate policies in the dynamic integrated assessment model (IAM) of climate and the economy (DICE2016R) and investigate (1) the utilization of (ocean) CDR under different climate objectives, (2) the sensitivity of policies with respect to carb… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
(84 reference statements)
0
23
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We complement this analysis by connecting it to a summary of the available quantitative evidence. Our review includes the rapidly emerging literature on the 1.5°C limit (Luderer et al 2013(Luderer et al , 2018Rogelj et al 2015Rogelj et al , 2018aManoussi et al 2017;Marcucci et al 2017;Mintenig et al 2017;Bauer et al 2018;Bertram et al 2018;Holz et al 2018;Kriegler et al 2018a;Rickels et al 2018;Strefler et al 2018;Séférian et al 2018;van Vuuren et al 2018;Grubler et al 2018) that include scenarios that emphasise the role of NETs even more than the 2°C scenarios in AR5.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We complement this analysis by connecting it to a summary of the available quantitative evidence. Our review includes the rapidly emerging literature on the 1.5°C limit (Luderer et al 2013(Luderer et al , 2018Rogelj et al 2015Rogelj et al , 2018aManoussi et al 2017;Marcucci et al 2017;Mintenig et al 2017;Bauer et al 2018;Bertram et al 2018;Holz et al 2018;Kriegler et al 2018a;Rickels et al 2018;Strefler et al 2018;Séférian et al 2018;van Vuuren et al 2018;Grubler et al 2018) that include scenarios that emphasise the role of NETs even more than the 2°C scenarios in AR5.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Azar et al (2006),Klein et al (2011), van Vuuren et al (2013,Koelbl et al (2014),Luderer et al (2016b),Manoussi et al (2017),Mintenig et al (2017),Tavoni et al (2017),Holz et al (2018),Kober et al (2018),Lehtilä and Koljonen (2018),Luderer et al (2018),Rickels et al (2018) Mitigation costsC1Lower_costsThe availability and use of NET lower carbon prices and so decrease aggregated discounted mitigation costs. Any techno-economic limitations of NETs would result in an increase of mitigation costs (e.g.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our 3D geological model is derived from Allenbach et al (2017) and considers nine lithostratigraphic units that have been previously described by Capar et al (2015); Clerc et al (2015) and summarized in the stratigraphic log of Figure 3. The units are divided by lithostratigraphic horizons interpolated in the 3D Geomol static model (Allenbach et al, 2017;Clerc et al, 2015). In addition to the stratigraphic horizons, we also consider the topography of the Geneva Basin (Figure 4).…”
Section: Model Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interpreted well data are extracted from Capar et al (2015); Rusillon (2017) and (a), (b), (c) are modified after Rusillon (2017). Interpreted seismic lines are obtained from Allenbach et al (2017) and Clerc et al (2015). tested by Collignon et al (2020) to investigate low-to medium-enthalpy hydrothermal and groundwater systems (MRST geothermal module) (https://www.sintef.no/projectweb/mrst/modules/#geothermal).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%