2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2009.01.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrated assessment of future CAP policies: land use changes, spatial patterns and targeting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
46
0
5

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
46
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Such behavioral validations are still a challenge in ABM [69,70,72]. In contrast to other ABM studies addressing farmland abandonment [40][41][42]45], however, we do not model individual farms and remain within the structure of traditional normative farm sector supply modeling approaches [56]. One key challenge in such normative approaches is that corner solutions emerge and these only change if input parameters vary considerably or additional restrictions are introduced into the model structure [56].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such behavioral validations are still a challenge in ABM [69,70,72]. In contrast to other ABM studies addressing farmland abandonment [40][41][42]45], however, we do not model individual farms and remain within the structure of traditional normative farm sector supply modeling approaches [56]. One key challenge in such normative approaches is that corner solutions emerge and these only change if input parameters vary considerably or additional restrictions are introduced into the model structure [56].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing ABM studies that address farmland abandonment and that consider individual farm decision-making underline the importance of a spatially explicit examination of the linkage between social behavior and environmental factors, and consequently the dynamic heterogeneity of land abandonment and re-forestation [40][41][42][43][44][45]. None of these studies, however, explicitly discusses the consequences of implementing a particular representation of decision-making and the associated short or long term perspective into their model structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common quantitative method to study farm structural change is using econometric models, as shown in the review by Zimmermann et al (2009), or agent-based models as applied by Piorr et al (2009). However, nearly all of the past studies had short time horizons.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, a long time horizon brings many uncertainties as to how future farm development will unfold in the context of multiple drivers of change acting at different levels. Agent-based models may provide a more realistic approach, but also in these models decisions are often based on profit maximization (Piorr et al 2009). Valbuena et al (2010) developed rules reflecting current farmers' behavior, but their study focused on specific decisions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nitrate leakage was assessed using an indicator-based, fuzzy-logic method (Zander and Kächele 1999;Mertens and Huwe 2002;Zander 2003;Piorr et al 2009). Fuzzy logic is based on the idea that the boundary between suitability and unsuitability (or acceptance and rejection) of an agricultural practice is not clear, but rather blurred or 'fuzzy' (Phillis and Andriantiatsaholiniaina 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%