2014 International Conference on Prognostics and Health Management 2014
DOI: 10.1109/icphm.2014.7036361
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrated Bayesian framework for remaining useful life prediction

Abstract: In this paper, a data-driven method for remaining useful life (RUL) prediction is presented. The method learns the relation between acquired sensor data and end of life time (EOL) to predict the RUL. The proposed method extracts monotonic trends from offline sensor signals, which are used to build reference models. From online signals the method represents the uncertainty about the current status, using discrete Bayesian filter. Finally, the method predicts RUL of the monitored component using integrated metho… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
28
1
Order By: Relevance
“…IBL application in prognostics is relatively new (beginning of the 2000s) [11][12][13][14][15]. IBL re-utilizes the experience gained from solving similar instances to solve new problem instances.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…IBL application in prognostics is relatively new (beginning of the 2000s) [11][12][13][14][15]. IBL re-utilizes the experience gained from solving similar instances to solve new problem instances.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The final RUL estimate of the given engine was obtained by aggregating the RULs of similar training instance via a similarity weighted average. Mosallam et al in [13] modeled the monitoring data as trajectories that characterize the lifecycle of the component using principal component analysis. For the problem component, the most similar trajectory is retrieved based on the Euclidean distance, and its RUL is directly considered as the RUL for the new component.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Failure points [21,23,30,34,39,40]. If this is satisfied, estimated RUL is expected to be accurate [73].…”
Section: Fault Initiationmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…These works used either experimental [30,33,34,36,37]or simulated [31,35] or actual [32] raw sensor data. [23,[25][26][27]41,42,44] or simulated [22,24,[38][39][40][41][42][43]45]…”
Section: K-nearest Neighbours Regression (Knnr) Which Belongs To Simimentioning
confidence: 99%