2011
DOI: 10.3906/yer-1005-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrated Biostratigraphy of Eocene Deposits in the Gubs Section (Northern Caucasus) with special Attention to the Ypresian/Lutetian Boundary and to the Peritethyan-Tethyan Correlation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1). The studied section contains a succession of middle-late Eocene sediments divided into the Cherkessk, Keresta, Kuma, and Belaya Glina Formations (Zakrevskaya et al, 2011;Beniamovski, 2012), which were deposited in a continental shelf setting (van der Boon et al, 2019). Here, we defined the base of the section (0 m) as the sharp transition from the green clays of the Cherkessk Formation to the white marls of the Keresta Formation (Fig.…”
Section: Geological Setting and Stratigraphymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1). The studied section contains a succession of middle-late Eocene sediments divided into the Cherkessk, Keresta, Kuma, and Belaya Glina Formations (Zakrevskaya et al, 2011;Beniamovski, 2012), which were deposited in a continental shelf setting (van der Boon et al, 2019). Here, we defined the base of the section (0 m) as the sharp transition from the green clays of the Cherkessk Formation to the white marls of the Keresta Formation (Fig.…”
Section: Geological Setting and Stratigraphymentioning
confidence: 99%