Integrated Computational Design of Three-Phase Mo–Si–B Alloy Turbine Blade for High-Temperature Aerospace Applications

Ellis, Brett D.; Hasan, Haider; Priddy, Matthew W.; Patra, Anirban

doi:10.1007/s40192-021-00207-6

Cited by 4 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 46 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…While these constitutive equations for J 2 plasticity have existed previously, we have considered physicallybased deformation mechanisms, along with dislocation density-based strengthening. These dislocation densitybased models have been adapted to material-specific strengthening mechanisms for Ni-based superalloys in the present work from prior studies, [32][33][34] where they were used for studying deformation in various multi-phase alloys. The following discusses equations that account for contributions due to each of these distinct strengthening mechanisms to the σ f term.…”

Section: Constitutive Modelmentioning

confidence: 99%

Dislocation density‐based constitutive model for cyclic deformation and softening of Ni‐based superalloys

Kumar,

Patra,

Sahu

2024

Fatigue Fract Eng Mat Struct

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A physically‐based constitutive modeling framework is proposed for the cyclic deformation and softening of Ni‐based superalloys. The constitutive model accounts for underlying mechanisms of grain size strengthening, dislocation strengthening, solid solution strengthening, and precipitate strengthening, commonly observed in these alloys. A constitutive model is proposed for the shearing of precipitates on their interaction with glide dislocations during cyclic deformation. This is the primary contributor to the experimentally observed cyclic softening behavior in Ni‐based superalloys. Model predictions of the cyclic stress–strain response and the cyclic softening (quantified in terms of the peak stress) are compared with the experimental counterparts for a range of strain amplitudes under fully‐reversed cyclic loading of Inconel 718 (IN 718). Further, model predictions of precipitate size are also compared with the experimentally measured transmission electron micrographs of precipitate sizes at the end of deformation. Concurrence in the cyclic stress–strain response, peak stress, and precipitate size provides validation for our constitutive modeling framework.

show abstract

Section: Constitutive Modelmentioning

confidence: 99%