2020 IEEE Texas Power and Energy Conference (TPEC) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/tpec48276.2020.9042560
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrated Coordination of Voltage Regulators with Distributed Cooperative Inverter Control in Systems with High Penetration of DGs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Authors in Reference 99 represented a generalized bender decomposition (GBD) algorithm for optimal scheduling the voltage regulators and the PVGUs over a time horizon window. In Reference 100, authors introduced coordination between the voltage regulators and the inverter controller to enhance the system voltage regulation with the increased integration of the PVGUs in the LVDNs. While authors in Reference 101 proposed a virtual complex impedance‐based P‐V droop controller for enhancing the active and reactive power sharing, eliminating the impact of line impedance mismatches, and restoring the system voltage after any violations in the operating conditions.…”
Section: Impact Of Excessive Penetration Of Pv Systems In Lvdnsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Authors in Reference 99 represented a generalized bender decomposition (GBD) algorithm for optimal scheduling the voltage regulators and the PVGUs over a time horizon window. In Reference 100, authors introduced coordination between the voltage regulators and the inverter controller to enhance the system voltage regulation with the increased integration of the PVGUs in the LVDNs. While authors in Reference 101 proposed a virtual complex impedance‐based P‐V droop controller for enhancing the active and reactive power sharing, eliminating the impact of line impedance mismatches, and restoring the system voltage after any violations in the operating conditions.…”
Section: Impact Of Excessive Penetration Of Pv Systems In Lvdnsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most methods for optimal installation of IBRs use only solar, wind or fuel cells, does not consider storage systems, and does not evaluate high penetration of IBRs. The most common challenges found in the literature are: the difficulty in performing the optimal allocation of distributed generation, as it must consider the generation capacity, location and type of generation used; the physical limitations of the system, which must consider the limitations of voltage, current, and generation capacity to prevent the grid from becoming inefficient or inoperative; economic viability, regardless of the method used, it must take into account the costs involved in implementing the IBR; integration with the existing electrical system, the intermittency of solar and wind generation is a challenge due to the intermittency of generation, energy quality, stability and voltage control; coordination with the power grid, which can be a major challenge especially when there are multiple distributed generation sources connected to the system [9] [10] [11] [18] [19] [20] [21] [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For basic operation of LTCs and parameter rules of thumb we refer to the text [9, Chapter 9.3], and to papers [1], [10]. One limitation of this approach is the assumed timescale separation between the LTC and inverters, which may not hold when LTCs delays are shortened to handle increased voltage variability [11]. Moreover, the simulations in these papers are not sufficient to guarantee against the possibility of sustained voltage oscillations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%