2018
DOI: 10.20546/ijcmas.2018.706.256
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrated Crop Management - A Way for Doubling the Income of Tomato Growers in Ramanagara District of Karnataka, India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
0
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
5
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Maximum fruit yield 11700 kg/ha with comfortable BC ratio of 2.53 was obtained in T1 multiple resistant tomato hybrid Arka Rakshak followed by T2 Sivam variety with highest BC ratio of 2.39. These results are in corroboration with the findings of Keshavareddy et al [6] and Sujeet Kumar and Ramanjini Gowda [2].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Maximum fruit yield 11700 kg/ha with comfortable BC ratio of 2.53 was obtained in T1 multiple resistant tomato hybrid Arka Rakshak followed by T2 Sivam variety with highest BC ratio of 2.39. These results are in corroboration with the findings of Keshavareddy et al [6] and Sujeet Kumar and Ramanjini Gowda [2].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…4). The results corroborate those Kale et al [7], Mokidue et al [16] and Keshava reddy et al [13]. Cost benefit ratio was higher in the demonstration plots against farmers' practice in all the three years of study (Table 2 and Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The results make it amply clear for the feasibility of the demonstrated technology in this region for improving the yield of tomato. Similar results were reported by Kale et al [7], Katare et al [12], Keshavareddy et al [13] and Dayanand [14] in mustard.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Similar findings were also recorded by Singh et al, (2016) and Chapke (2012). Katare et al, (2011), Keshavareddy et al, (2018 and Dayanand (2012) in mustard.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The additional cost increased in the demonstration was mainly due to more cost involved in balanced fertilizer, procurement of improved hybrid and IPM practices. The data revealed that the net return from the demonstration were substantially higher than control plots similar results are in corroboration with the findings of Mokidue et al, (2011) and Keshavareddy et al, (2018). B: C ratio was recorded to be higher under demonstration against control during both the years of study.…”
Section: Benefit-cost (B: C) Ratiosupporting
confidence: 90%