2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0921-3449(00)00078-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrated effects of a reduction in collection frequency for a kerbside newspaper recycling scheme

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…refs. [13,15]). If sorting is too complicated, householders in widely dispersed and isolated areas may be reluctant to sort the waste and instead dump their waste into valleys or rivers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…refs. [13,15]). If sorting is too complicated, householders in widely dispersed and isolated areas may be reluctant to sort the waste and instead dump their waste into valleys or rivers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although Wertz (1976) found that service frequency could influence the quantities of waste collected, Kemper and Quigley (1976) found no significant relationship between the number of annual collection visits and the annual quantity of discarded waste. More modern research suggests that reducing collection frequency is a way to reduce waste collection costs that does not necessarily impact negatively on participation (Tucker et al, 2001). Fortnightly (rather than weekly) collections often mean that residents present bins each time to avoid missing a collection and struggling with the capacity they have for waste before the next collection is due (McLeod and Cherrett, 2008).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To gain and maintain householder's cooperation, a scheme needs to be both user-and operator-friendly (Read, 1999). Simple to understand schemes with frequent collections using containers appropriate to the property's available storage space have a better chance of achieving high participation levels (Tucker et al, 2001). Convenient, simple, well explained schemes should achieve reasonable yields of recyclates and high levels of customer satisfaction.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, available space might preclude large multiple containers for some households (Tucker et al, 2001;Barr and Gilg, 2005), therefore, the use of smaller containers (bags or boxes) for those with limited storage space increased participation in apartments blocks (Barr and Gilg, 2005;den Boer et al, 2007).…”
Section: Recycling Household Wastementioning
confidence: 99%