Integrated evaluation: A synthesis of approaches to the evaluation of broad-aim social programs

Alterman, Rachelle; Carmon, Naomi; Hill, M.O.

doi:10.1016/0038-0121(84)90047-8

Cited by 19 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 24 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Although some scholars do investigate plan conformance, these are centred on outcome conformance (or more specifically on land use change) rather than output conformance (Ahmad Nazri Muhamad Ludin, Mohd Nuruddin Abdul Kadir, & Susilawati Sulaiman, 2009;Alterman, Carmon, & Hill, 1984;Chapin, Deyle, & Baker, 2008;Combe, 2008;Hao, Sliuzas, Zhan, & Geertman, 2009;Laurian et al, 2010;Tarmiji Masron & Ruslan Rainis, 2004). Except for Calkins (1979), who proposes a 'planning monitor' to measure plan output conformance.…”

Section: Plan Output Monitoringmentioning

confidence: 99%

Monitoring the Performance of State Structure Plan in Delivering Output Using Dynamic Model

Abdullah

Zahari

et al. 2016

PMJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Plan outputs are the material objects that are tangible and provided as a result of the implementation of a development plan. They often act as precursor to achieving plan outcomes. Therefore, it is important to monitor the performance of plan in delivering its outputs so that the prospect of achieving its outcomes remains high. However, present state structure plan monitoring programmes focus mostly on monitoring land use change and not plan output delivery. The absence of output monitoring reduces the usefulness of the programmes and contributes to under-provision of outputs, especially public facilities and open spaces. This study proposes that state structure plan monitoring programmes must include mechanism to monitor the performance of the plan in delivering plan outputs. To this end, a dynamic model for monitoring performance of state structure plan in delivering open spaces was developed using STELLA software and applied on the Selangor State Structure Plan. The model simulation showed that the Selangor State Structure Plan has performed poorly in delivering the open spaces where their provision has not conform to the plan's targets. The model simulations also show that this nonconformances will remain by the end of the plan's planning period.

show abstract

Section: Plan Output Monitoringmentioning

confidence: 99%

Monitoring the Performance of State Structure Plan in Delivering Output Using Dynamic Model

Abdullah

Zahari

et al. 2016

PMJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Despite its importance, prior studies related to monitoring of plan output conformance is limited. Although some scholars do investigate plan conformance, these are centred on outcome conformance (or more specifically on land use change) rather than output conformance (Ahmad Nazri Muhamad Ludin, Mohd Nuruddin Abdul Kadir, & Susilawati Sulaiman, 2009;Alterman, Carmon, & Hill, 1984;Chapin, Deyle, & Baker, 2008;Combe, 2008;Hao, Sliuzas, Zhan, & Geertman, 2009;Laurian et al, 2010;Tarmiji Masron & Ruslan Rainis, 2004). Except for Calkins (1979), who proposes a 'planning monitor' to measure plan output conformance.…”

Section: Plan Output Monitoringmentioning

confidence: 99%

Monitoring the Performance of State Structure Plan in Delivering Output Using Dynamic Model

Abdullah

Zahari

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Plan outputs are the material objects that are tangible and provided as a result of the implementation of a development plan. They often act as precursor to achieving plan outcomes. Therefore, it is important to monitor the performance of plan in delivering its outputs so that the prospect of achieving its outcomes remains high. However, present state structure plan monitoring programmes focus mostly on monitoring land use change and not plan output delivery. The absence of output monitoring reduces the usefulness of the programmes and contributes to under-provision of outputs, especially public facilities and open spaces. This study proposes that state structure plan monitoring programmes must include mechanism to monitor the performance of the plan in delivering plan outputs. To this end, a dynamic model for monitoring performance of state structure plan in delivering open spaces was developed using STELLA software and applied on the Selangor State Structure Plan. The model simulation showed that the Selangor State Structure Plan has performed poorly in delivering the open spaces where their provision has not conform to the planâ€™s targets. The model simulations also show that this nonconformances will remain by the end of the planâ€™s planning period.

show abstract

“…Wang, K., Zhang, Y., Jang, C., Phillips, S., and Wang, B., (2008) Planners (2016) Despite its importance, prior studies related to monitoring of plan output conformance is limited. Although some scholars do investigate plan conformance, these are centred on outcome conformance (or more specifically on land use change) rather than output conformance (Ahmad Nazri Muhamad Ludin, Mohd Nuruddin Abdul Kadir, & Susilawati Sulaiman, 2009;Alterman, Carmon, & Hill, 1984;Chapin, Deyle, & Baker, 2008;Combe, 2008;Hao, Sliuzas, Zhan, & Geertman, 2009;Laurian et al, 2010;Tarmiji Masron & Ruslan Rainis, 2004). Except for Calkins (1979), who proposes a 'planning monitor' to measure plan output conformance.…”

Section: Public Motorized Transportmentioning

confidence: 99%

Special Issue 4 : 2016

Conference¹

2016

PMJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Integrated evaluation: A synthesis of approaches to the evaluation of broad-aim social programs

Cited by 19 publications

References 24 publications

Monitoring the Performance of State Structure Plan in Delivering Output Using Dynamic Model

Monitoring the Performance of State Structure Plan in Delivering Output Using Dynamic Model

Monitoring the Performance of State Structure Plan in Delivering Output Using Dynamic Model

Special Issue 4 : 2016

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About