2011
DOI: 10.1080/10447318.2011.540492
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrated Faceted Browser and Direct Search to Enhance Information Retrieval in Text-Based Digital Libraries

Abstract: Browsing and searching are two prominent paradigms in information retrieval. As digital libraries grow in size and types of collections, their user bases are expanding and include more non-expert users. For those who are not familiar with what the content of a specific text-based digital collection is or its data structure, the browse functionality offers the entry point to explore and obtain an overview. In current digital library implementations, exploratory browsing is sometimes not available as an option. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The unified metadata consist of facets, which Wynar and Taylor (1992) defined as mutually exclusive and collectively exhaustive properties of information items (e.g., books, journals, articles, etc.). With the utilization of faceted browsing and searching, users can achieve higher task accuracy and satisfaction than traditional direct search (Yeh & Liu, 2011). Because of these potential advantages of discovery tools over traditional library catalogs, the number of libraries in a sample of 260 academic libraries in the U.S. and Canada employing discovery tools has doubled from 2010 to 2012, increasing from 16% to 29% (Hofmann & Yang, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The unified metadata consist of facets, which Wynar and Taylor (1992) defined as mutually exclusive and collectively exhaustive properties of information items (e.g., books, journals, articles, etc.). With the utilization of faceted browsing and searching, users can achieve higher task accuracy and satisfaction than traditional direct search (Yeh & Liu, 2011). Because of these potential advantages of discovery tools over traditional library catalogs, the number of libraries in a sample of 260 academic libraries in the U.S. and Canada employing discovery tools has doubled from 2010 to 2012, increasing from 16% to 29% (Hofmann & Yang, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the field of document analysis, examples of system-structured spaces include scatter plots (Ahlberg & Shneiderman, 1994;Kang, Grg, & Stasko, 2010), clustering based on latent semantic analysis or similar (Russell, Slaney, Qu, & Houston, 2006;Gregory, Payne, McColgin, Cramer, & Love, 2007;Kang et al, 2010), and 3D data terrains (Wise et al, 1995). Interaction typically involves filtering large datasets (Yeh & Liu, 2011) to reveal trends and relationships that are within the data or are found through the application of analytics.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, the resulting trials are indexed through a small number of facets, each defining a distinct property of the text, and users can select facets to filter the search results [12–15]. eTACTS defines eligibility tags as facets for the clinical trial search results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%