2001
DOI: 10.1071/aseg2001ab030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrated geophysical appraisal of crustal architecture in the eastern Lachlan Orogen

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
8
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
3
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The crustal structure is constrained in few locations from passive seismic experiment: receiver function (RF) studies (Shibutani et al 1996;Clitheroe et al 2000;Kennett et al 2011). An anisotropic upper, middle and lower crust was well imaged in previous seismic reflection data (Direen et al 2001;Glen et al 2002) and the seismic interface between the crust and the mantle was interpreted as not flat Glen et al 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The crustal structure is constrained in few locations from passive seismic experiment: receiver function (RF) studies (Shibutani et al 1996;Clitheroe et al 2000;Kennett et al 2011). An anisotropic upper, middle and lower crust was well imaged in previous seismic reflection data (Direen et al 2001;Glen et al 2002) and the seismic interface between the crust and the mantle was interpreted as not flat Glen et al 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…The V P /V S ratio is around 1.7 at CAN and CNB and 1.75 at YNG compatible with the presence of granite-gneiss beneath CAN and CNB and biotite gneiss beneath YNG. At SO01 this would be the down dip extension of mafic rocks imaged and modelled in Direen et al (2001), (Figure 4a, b). At CAN and CNB stations, the V P /V S values are compatible with mafic orthogneisses or mafic granulite inferred in the lower crust from a wide-angle seismic profile in the southern Lachlan Orogen .…”
Section: P /V S Ratiosmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Geophysical support for an oceanic middle crust was cited by Glen et al (2002), from two lines of evidence: a seismic refraction interpretation indicated a layer from about 15 to about 30 km depth with V p = 6.4-6.6 kms -1 , interpreted to represent mafic lithologies (Finlayson et al, 2002); and a cross-section derived from a potential field model showing an equivalent layer as MORB volcanic rocks. However, the range of velocities for this layer corresponds to the average crustal velocity reported for both continental arcs and shields over the equivalent depth range (Christensen and Mooney, 1995), and the original potential field model, as shown in Direen et al (2001), identifies this layer as simply mid-crust, and assigns a magnetic susceptibility of zero, inconsistent with a mafic composition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%