2022
DOI: 10.1109/jstars.2022.3176951
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrated Imaging Mission Planning Modeling Method for Multi-Type Targets for Super-Agile Earth Observation Satellite

Abstract: A unified description for the imaging mission of different types of targets is lacking, making overall optimization of imaging missions of complex multi-type targets (point, curve, and area) within a single pass difficult when using traditional satellite imaging mission planning. We propose an imaging mission planning modeling method based on the optimal mission decomposition/merge (MD/M) strategy for imaging missions of multi-type targets within a single pass of super-agile earth observation satellites. This … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Long [21] implemented a two-phase process of mission clustering and planning, utilizing an improved graph-theoretic cluster partitioning algorithm along with a hybrid genetic and simulated annealing (GA-SA) algorithm to augment its optimization capability. Lu [22] presented a unified description for different types of targets and utilized an improved particle swarm algorithm to solve the mission planning model. However, these studies are only applicable to planning and scheduling for a single satellite and cannot manage large-scale mission planning problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Long [21] implemented a two-phase process of mission clustering and planning, utilizing an improved graph-theoretic cluster partitioning algorithm along with a hybrid genetic and simulated annealing (GA-SA) algorithm to augment its optimization capability. Lu [22] presented a unified description for different types of targets and utilized an improved particle swarm algorithm to solve the mission planning model. However, these studies are only applicable to planning and scheduling for a single satellite and cannot manage large-scale mission planning problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although many metaheuristic algorithms have already been developed to solve the mission scheduling problem for AEOSs, there are still some challenges to overcome [39][40][41][42]. The main challenge comes from the low computational efficiency, which can be explained from two perspectives.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%