2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-021-06616-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrated optimization method for helical gear hobbing parameters considering machining efficiency, cost and precision

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…e precondition of fine blanking die wear is the friction between the die and the material working surface during fine blanking [12], but the severity of die working surface wear mainly depends on the normal force acting on the die surface, sliding speed, the state of the friction surface, and the hardness of the die surface according to the Archard wear model.…”
Section: Comparative Analysis Of Wear Amountmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e precondition of fine blanking die wear is the friction between the die and the material working surface during fine blanking [12], but the severity of die working surface wear mainly depends on the normal force acting on the die surface, sliding speed, the state of the friction surface, and the hardness of the die surface according to the Archard wear model.…”
Section: Comparative Analysis Of Wear Amountmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of these negatives include increased tool wear due to a higher cutting force and temperature. Other works proposed developing a model for optimisation of the gear finish in the hobbing process [42][43][44] and the use of machine learning models to predict the RUL [4,17]. Cheng et al [19] provided a mechanism to test how high-speed dry gear hobbing can affect tool wear.…”
Section: Other Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the above expression, x → i (t) represents the optimum position determined after t iterations of the ith tooth, g → i,best represents the previous optimum position of the ith tooth, z → i,best represents the optimum location determined under the global prediction, F i,best represents the determined fitness value obtained at the g → i,best position, and Fx i represents the fitness value obtained at the x → i (t) position. e direction determined according to the prediction can be based on the current optimum position and the optimum position obtained when the gear teeth pass through t iterations [7,8].…”
Section: Determination Of the Global Prediction Directionmentioning
confidence: 99%