2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.cie.2007.06.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrated process planning and scheduling in a supply chain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
49
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Same problem was also attempted by Shao et al [19] using a modified genetic algorithm, a hybrid GA by Amin-Naseri and Afshari [41] and an improved by Lihong and Shengping [35]. The later three studies obtained a makespan value 14 as compared to 16 by Moon et al [40]. The proposed GA approach also found a makespan value of 14 which was better than above mentioned earlier studies.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 63%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Same problem was also attempted by Shao et al [19] using a modified genetic algorithm, a hybrid GA by Amin-Naseri and Afshari [41] and an improved by Lihong and Shengping [35]. The later three studies obtained a makespan value 14 as compared to 16 by Moon et al [40]. The proposed GA approach also found a makespan value of 14 which was better than above mentioned earlier studies.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Each job has 2 to 4 operations. The objective function addressed by Moon et al [40] was minimisation of makespan. Using an evolutionary search approach, Moon et al [40] found the makespan value of 16.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Adopted from Moon et al [14] The best solution obtained is 14. The Gantt chart for the best solution is shown in fig.…”
Section: ) Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%