Integrated product and production development - a systematic literature review

Disselkamp, Jan-Philipp; Cieply, J.; Dyck, Florian; Grothe, Robin; Anacker, Harald; Dumitrescu, Roman

doi:10.1016/j.procir.2023.06.198

Cited by 5 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 24 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The first phase of the DRM has already been conducted as part of a systematic literature review (SLR) to identify various challenges of integrative planning. (Disselkamp et al, 2023) The following research question was derived from the research clarification:…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The challenges are the sheer volume of information and the need to synchronise the IT tools of different departments. (Disselkamp et al, 2023) Current advances in the area of collecting, processing and analysing data offer the potential to use larger amounts of knowledge. (Albers et al, 2022) Added to this are the technologies summarised under the terms digital factory or Industry 4.0, which can counteract the lack of knowledge provision.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Challenges of the integrative product and production system development

Disselkamp,

Schütte,

Dumitrescu

2024

Proc. Des. Soc.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Shorter product lifecycles and a shift from mechatronic to cyber-physical systems are leading to greater product complexity. This complexity can be addressed by more intensive cooperation between product and production system development. Despite intensive development in recent years, these process models have not been able to establish themselves in corporate practice. Therefore, this paper analyses the existing integrative product and production methods to identify the reasons for their lack of use in practice. The analysis has shown that there are nine barriers.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Challenges of the integrative product and production system development

Disselkamp,

Schütte,

Dumitrescu

2024

Proc. Des. Soc.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Seamless integration and simultaneous generation of product, process and factory models is the key challenge (Azevedo and Almeida, 2011). Another challenge in factory planning is coordination with product development (Disselkamp et al, 2023). Factory planning projects also involve a large number of different stakeholders, which results in an increased organisational effort due to the need for effective coordination between them (Oehme et al, 2013).…”

Section: Challenges Of Data-driven Factory Planningmentioning

confidence: 99%

Towards the digital factory twin – design guide for creating a 3D factory model

Disselkamp,

Grothe,

Lick

et al. 2024

Proc. Des. Soc.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Shorter product lifecycles are also leading to even shorter planning times for the development of production systems. In most companies, the restructuring is carried out within a few weeks during the annual holidays. Digital tools such as simulations or the digital twin are used to avoid delaying the restructuring during this time. However, the introduction of a 3D model of the factory is often the first point of failure for many companies. This article proposes a six-step process model that enables the transition from 2D to 3D design. The process model was evaluated in a research project.

show abstract