2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2013.02.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrated production planning and order acceptance under uncertainty: A robust optimization approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For Charnes and Cooper [25], Chen et al [26], Liang [27], and Chen and Xu [28], in practical situations, the goals and model inputs (parameters) for the decisions are normally imprecise/vague, as some relevant information is incomplete and unavailable. However, the data uncertainty is inherent in most practical situations and should be taken into account in any realistic mathematical model [29]. In sugarcane harvest scheduling models, the uncertainty is inherent in most parameters, including climate condition, cost, demand, yield process, and capacity [30].…”
Section: Goal Programming Models With Uncertaintymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For Charnes and Cooper [25], Chen et al [26], Liang [27], and Chen and Xu [28], in practical situations, the goals and model inputs (parameters) for the decisions are normally imprecise/vague, as some relevant information is incomplete and unavailable. However, the data uncertainty is inherent in most practical situations and should be taken into account in any realistic mathematical model [29]. In sugarcane harvest scheduling models, the uncertainty is inherent in most parameters, including climate condition, cost, demand, yield process, and capacity [30].…”
Section: Goal Programming Models With Uncertaintymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first problem, from Liao [8], has three objective functions, see (24)- (26), and three constraints, see (27)- (29). In these objective functions, the coefficient x 1 in the g 1 function may have a value of 3 or 6, the coefficient x 2 in the g 2 function may have a value of 5 or 9, and the coefficient x 3 in the g 3 function may have a value of 7 or 10; the goals for each objective function are, respectively, 115, 80, and 110.…”
Section: The Rmcgp-lhs Model To Deal With Uncertainty In the Schedulimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aouam et al [8] formulated a model that integrates order acceptance decisions and production planning while considering demand uncertainty and proposed a robust optimization approach to solve it. Cowling et al [9] used a hybrid network to model the CC-HR planning problem and provided a solution based on mathematical programming and heuristic techniques.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aouam and Brahimi (2013) present a robust model that integrates production planning with load dependent lead-times and order acceptance decisions, which considers demand uncertainty and where a fraction of the order quantity can be accepted. They show that integrating the two decisions provides the planner with the flexibility to select the orders to be satisfied fully or partially.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is often important to distinguish customer orders for several reasons (Pahl et al, 2007;Aouam and Brahimi, 2013). Firstly, even if the finished good is the same, different customers might impose particular conditions on the source of raw materials or on the quality control tests to be carried out during the manufacturing process of their orders.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%