2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116121
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrated remote sensing and machine learning tools for estimating ecological flow regimes in tropical river reaches

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results from Experiments I and II indicate that, using either Landsat 8 or MODIS images individually, it is possible to make reasonable estimates about streamflow in high-flow periods by applying machine learning methods. Our findings are consistent with previous results [27,40,41], which indicate that reflectance signals derived from optical sensors are effective for tracing streamflows from space. The proposed method in this study is valuable for extending the temporal coverage of streamflows for the cases when only limited groundobserved streamflow records are available.…”
Section: Experiments Designsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The results from Experiments I and II indicate that, using either Landsat 8 or MODIS images individually, it is possible to make reasonable estimates about streamflow in high-flow periods by applying machine learning methods. Our findings are consistent with previous results [27,40,41], which indicate that reflectance signals derived from optical sensors are effective for tracing streamflows from space. The proposed method in this study is valuable for extending the temporal coverage of streamflows for the cases when only limited groundobserved streamflow records are available.…”
Section: Experiments Designsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…More importantly, in all three methods, the models integrating optical images and SAR images performed better than the other models. The NSEs of such models (Models 3, 6, and 9) were in the range of 0.83 to 0.97, which is satisfactory in comparison with previous studies on streamflow estimations using machine learning models (e.g., Ni et al [42], NSE: 0.65 to 0.84; Sahoo et al [27], NSE: 0.76 to 0.94; Uysal et al [43], NSE: 0.75 to 0.81). In other words, adding information derived from high-resolution SAR images to low-resolution optical images could improve the performance compared with an SVR model that solely uses optical images as input.…”
Section: Experiments Designsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Due to the widespread reduction in hydrometric stations, remote sensing data are becoming increasingly popular for assessing the river discharge regimes [38]. In general, the use of satellite data increases the accuracy of calculation [39], reconstructing [40] and forecasting the volume of water discharge with a sufficiently high value of the Nash-Sutcliffe model coefficient of efficiency (NSE), such as in [41], where the value of NSE = 0.8 was achieved.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spatiotemporal fusion models use two or more images to obtain fine spatial resolution images; thus, they can simultaneously improve spatial resolution and temporal coverage [15][16][17][18][19]. Wang et al [20] pointed out that the spatiotemporal fusion approach shows a better performance compared to the statistical downscaling method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%