2011
DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkr099
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrated safety summary of FOCUS 1 and FOCUS 2 trials: Phase III randomized, double-blind studies evaluating ceftaroline fosamil for the treatment of patients with community-acquired pneumonia

Abstract: The data from the FOCUS 1 and FOCUS 2 trials presented in this integrated safety summary demonstrate that ceftaroline fosamil is well tolerated, with a tolerability profile similar to ceftriaxone and the cephalosporin class overall, with no unexpected safety concerns being identified.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
37
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
3
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Patients participated in scheduled laboratory visits from initiation until the TOC visit, while unscheduled laboratory visits were conducted until the LFU visit. [8][9][10] The following safety results reported are from the integrated summary of the FOCUS 1 and FOCUS 2 clinical trials. The most frequently documented TEAEs in the ceftaroline fosamil treatment group were diarrhea (4.2%), headache (3.4%), and insomnia (3.1%).…”
Section: Ceftaroline Fosamilmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Patients participated in scheduled laboratory visits from initiation until the TOC visit, while unscheduled laboratory visits were conducted until the LFU visit. [8][9][10] The following safety results reported are from the integrated summary of the FOCUS 1 and FOCUS 2 clinical trials. The most frequently documented TEAEs in the ceftaroline fosamil treatment group were diarrhea (4.2%), headache (3.4%), and insomnia (3.1%).…”
Section: Ceftaroline Fosamilmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The overall incidence rates of adverse events (AEs) were consistent between the ceftaroline fosamil group and the ceftriaxone group, respectively, as follows: patients experiencing at least 1 TEAE (47.0% vs 45.7%), SAE (11.3% vs 11.7%), discontinuation due to an AE (4.4% vs 4.1%), or who died (2.4% vs 2.0%). 10 A total of 27 deaths occurred during the FOCUS trials; 15 occurred in the ceftaroline fosamil group and 12 in the ceftriaxone group. Two deaths (1 from each group) could have been related to study drug when reviewed by the investigator.…”
Section: Ceftaroline Fosamilmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As expected, the positive control teicoplanin at 20 mg/kg IM displayed activity against the MRSA strain, with a sterilization rate of 60%, and bacterial titers similar to those observed with vancomycin against the same MRSA strain (Jacqueline et al, 2007 Ceftaroline fosamil (prodrug of the active metabolite) is a new, broad-spectrum cephalosporin recently approved in the USA for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections and community-acquired bacterial pneumonia. Data from both clinical trials Wilcox et al, 2010;Rank et al, 2011) and animal studies…”
Section: Assessment Of Intramuscular Administration Of Ceftarolinementioning
confidence: 99%