IEEE INFOCOM '99. Conference on Computer Communications. Proceedings. Eighteenth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer A 1999
DOI: 10.1109/infcom.1999.751670
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrated scheduling of unicast and multicast traffic in an input-queued switch

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [8], it was proved that the multicast scheduling problem is NP-hard, both with and without fanout splitting. In the case of fanout splitting, every partial service causes an increase of the input load, leading to performance penalties.…”
Section: Scheduling Discipline and Queueing Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In [8], it was proved that the multicast scheduling problem is NP-hard, both with and without fanout splitting. In the case of fanout splitting, every partial service causes an increase of the input load, leading to performance penalties.…”
Section: Scheduling Discipline and Queueing Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Referring to the stochastic version of Lyapunov stability [15], the maximum throughput of the switch can be obtained, as proved in Appendix A, by solving the following optimization problem at each time slot (8) subject to constraints (2), (3), (4), and (5).…”
Section: Optimal Scheduling and Capacity Regionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is also stated that "the numerical evaluation of the necessary speedup is prohibitive" and no scaling law has been given for the necessary speedup for 100% throughput. Also, finding the multicast schedule that works with the minimum necessary speedup is NP-hard as shown in [1]. There are obvious ways of simplifying multicast scheduling, such as ruling out fanout splitting.…”
Section: Switch Model and Multicast Trafficmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the main reasons for this is the difficulty of the task. Indeed, it was shown in [1] that "optimal scheduling" of multicast packets is NP-hard over a crossbar switch and in [2] it was proved that the resource speedup necessary to achieve 100% throughput for all admissible multicast traffic grows unbounded with increasing switch size. These results hold even when the crossbar switch is multicast capable, i.e., it is capable of connecting an input to multiple outputs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%