IECON 2012 - 38th Annual Conference on IEEE Industrial Electronics Society 2012
DOI: 10.1109/iecon.2012.6388941
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrated SEPIC buck-boost converter as an off-line LED driver without electrolytic capacitors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0
7

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
27
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, if an integrated converter has a shared switch, which must handle the sum of the voltages of the two switches of the corresponding nonintegrated converter, this shared transistor will be forced to be of a higher voltage rating, thus with higher on-resistance and larger conduction losses; a higher voltage stress will also increase the switching losses. These phenomena limit the conversion efficiency of integrated solutions, as can be seen in many integrated offline LED drivers [17], [51]- [57] (PFC integrated with the PC stages), most of which have an overall conversion efficiency of 85% or lower. In cascaded converters with hard-switching operation, the increased losses arising from integration further accentuate the efficiency issue because full power reprocessing is carried out by each stage.…”
Section: Integrated Stagesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For example, if an integrated converter has a shared switch, which must handle the sum of the voltages of the two switches of the corresponding nonintegrated converter, this shared transistor will be forced to be of a higher voltage rating, thus with higher on-resistance and larger conduction losses; a higher voltage stress will also increase the switching losses. These phenomena limit the conversion efficiency of integrated solutions, as can be seen in many integrated offline LED drivers [17], [51]- [57] (PFC integrated with the PC stages), most of which have an overall conversion efficiency of 85% or lower. In cascaded converters with hard-switching operation, the increased losses arising from integration further accentuate the efficiency issue because full power reprocessing is carried out by each stage.…”
Section: Integrated Stagesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The luminous efficacy of a LED is directly dependent of the forward current ripple in the device [11]. As stated in the same study, a load current ripple of 50% is used here as a parameter for the power supply design.…”
Section: B Power Stage Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The search for efficient and low cost solutions for LED drivers has been the focus of much research today. These devices must provide regulated current to the load and perform the power quality requirements, e.g., as stated in IEC 61000-3-2, when these drivers are fed from the mains [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to reduce cost, size, and the complexity, the integrated stages and one stage LED drivers are proposed. Integrated stages employ two separate converters implemented with only one active power switch or to form a single-stage solution [5], [9], [10]. State-ofthe-art for a single stage LED driver has been published in [1], [11], [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%