2016
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149673
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrated Taxonomy and DNA Barcoding of Alpine Midges (Diptera: Chironomidae)

Abstract: Rapid and efficient DNA-based tools are recommended for the evaluation of the insect biodiversity of high-altitude streams. In the present study, focused principally on larvae of the genus Diamesa Meigen 1835 (Diptera: Chironomidae), the congruence between morphological/molecular delimitation of species as well as performances in taxonomic assignments were evaluated. A fragment of the mitochondrial cox1 gene was obtained from 112 larvae, pupae and adults (Diamesinae, Orthocladiinae and Tanypodinae) that were c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
59
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
4
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies have reported on barcoding results for Coleoptera (Hendrich et al, 2015;Raupach, Hannig, Moriniere, & Hendrich, 2016;Raupach, Hannig, Morinière, & Hendrich, 2018;Rulik et al, 2017), Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera and Trichoptera , Heteroptera (Havemann et al, 2018;Raupach et al, 2014), Hymenoptera (Schmid-Egger et al, 2019;Schmidt, Schmid-Egger, Morinière, Haszprunar, & Hebert, 2015;Schmidt et al, 2017), Lepidoptera Hausmann, Haszprunar, Segerer, et al, 2011), Neuroptera , Orthoptera (Hawlitschek et al, 2017), Araneae and Opiliones , and Myriapoda (Spelda, Reip, Oliveira Biener, & Melzer, 2011;Wesener et al, 2015). Concerning DNA barcoding studies performed for Diptera, no comprehensive study encompassing this entire highly diverse order has been published, but data have been used to revise smaller units thereof: for example, for Calliphoridae (Jordaens et al, 2013;Nelson, Wallman, & Dowton, 2007;Reibe, Schmitz, & Madea, 2009), Ceratopogonidae (Stur & Borkent, 2014), Chironomidae (Carew, Pettigrove, Cox, & Hoffmann, 2007;Carew, Pettigrove, & Hoffmann, 2005;Cranston et al, 2013;Ekrem, Stur, & Hebert, 2010;Ekrem, Willassen, & Stur, 2007;Montagna, Mereghetti, Lencioni, & Rossaro, 2016;Pfenninger, Nowak, Kley, Steinke, & Streit, 2007;Sinclair & Gresens, 2008;Stur & Ekrem, 2011), Culicidae (Ashfaq et al, 2014;Cywinska, Hunter, & Hebert, 2006;Kumar, Rajavel, Natarajan, & Jambulingam, 2007;Versteirt et al, 2015;, Hybotidae…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have reported on barcoding results for Coleoptera (Hendrich et al, 2015;Raupach, Hannig, Moriniere, & Hendrich, 2016;Raupach, Hannig, Morinière, & Hendrich, 2018;Rulik et al, 2017), Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera and Trichoptera , Heteroptera (Havemann et al, 2018;Raupach et al, 2014), Hymenoptera (Schmid-Egger et al, 2019;Schmidt, Schmid-Egger, Morinière, Haszprunar, & Hebert, 2015;Schmidt et al, 2017), Lepidoptera Hausmann, Haszprunar, Segerer, et al, 2011), Neuroptera , Orthoptera (Hawlitschek et al, 2017), Araneae and Opiliones , and Myriapoda (Spelda, Reip, Oliveira Biener, & Melzer, 2011;Wesener et al, 2015). Concerning DNA barcoding studies performed for Diptera, no comprehensive study encompassing this entire highly diverse order has been published, but data have been used to revise smaller units thereof: for example, for Calliphoridae (Jordaens et al, 2013;Nelson, Wallman, & Dowton, 2007;Reibe, Schmitz, & Madea, 2009), Ceratopogonidae (Stur & Borkent, 2014), Chironomidae (Carew, Pettigrove, Cox, & Hoffmann, 2007;Carew, Pettigrove, & Hoffmann, 2005;Cranston et al, 2013;Ekrem, Stur, & Hebert, 2010;Ekrem, Willassen, & Stur, 2007;Montagna, Mereghetti, Lencioni, & Rossaro, 2016;Pfenninger, Nowak, Kley, Steinke, & Streit, 2007;Sinclair & Gresens, 2008;Stur & Ekrem, 2011), Culicidae (Ashfaq et al, 2014;Cywinska, Hunter, & Hebert, 2006;Kumar, Rajavel, Natarajan, & Jambulingam, 2007;Versteirt et al, 2015;, Hybotidae…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We obtained 658 bp of COI gene. Intraspecific sequence divergence ranged from 0.0 to 0.76% with a mean divergence value of 0.5%, which is within the normal range for chironomids (Montagna et al, 2016). Within the specimens of M. kamora, four haplotypes were encountered, which are divergent by eight synonymous transitional substitutions.…”
Section: Results Of Dna Barcodingmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…6) ranged from 11.9 to 12.5% (mean 12.1%). According to Montagna et al (2016) and Ekrem et al (2010) these values are sufficient to maintain the species level. The Bayesian tree contains all available species of subfamily Prodiamesinae shown in Fig.…”
Section: Results Of Dna Barcodingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following recent studies (Castro-Romero et al, 2016;Montagna et al, 2016;Song et al, 2017), outgroup species were included in the species delimitation analyses for two main reasons. First, although related species tend to be unduly lumped by the GMYC model when distantly related species are included (https://francoismichonneau.net/gmyc-tutorial/), this was clearly not the case here, as more species were recognized with the GMYC criterion than in the two other analyses (Fig.…”
Section: Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%