2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.brat.2021.104012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrating a functional view on suicide risk into idiographic statistical models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
24
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 101 publications
2
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, all statistical tests reviewed in the present report commonly estimate average effects across individuals, relying on the assumption that effects are homogeneous between people and over time. However, the degree of between study heterogeneity observed in this review and recent findings suggesting SITBs are likely a multiply determined complex process that vary widely across individuals 26 , 53 , suggests that any assumption of homogeneity in the link between negative affect and SITBs on the person level may be incorrect 54 , 55 . It is possible that this variability may be so great both between and within individuals that links between SITBs and candidate risk factors could be non-ergodic (i.e., effects are not consistent across people or within the same person over time).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally, all statistical tests reviewed in the present report commonly estimate average effects across individuals, relying on the assumption that effects are homogeneous between people and over time. However, the degree of between study heterogeneity observed in this review and recent findings suggesting SITBs are likely a multiply determined complex process that vary widely across individuals 26 , 53 , suggests that any assumption of homogeneity in the link between negative affect and SITBs on the person level may be incorrect 54 , 55 . It is possible that this variability may be so great both between and within individuals that links between SITBs and candidate risk factors could be non-ergodic (i.e., effects are not consistent across people or within the same person over time).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…It is possible that this variability may be so great both between and within individuals that links between SITBs and candidate risk factors could be non-ergodic (i.e., effects are not consistent across people or within the same person over time). Rather than using a nomothetic, group-level approach to render uniform inferences across diverse individuals, an idiographic approach 54 57 may be especially beneficial for identifying consistency in relations between negative affect (or other antecedents/consequences) and SITBs across individuals and time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 Personalization. Suicide risk is complex and heterogeneous, 19,25,26 but there is little guidance on how to personalize the content and format of existing interventions. Regarding content, current "gold-standard" psychosocial interventions for targeting suicide risk consist of some combination of the following elements: caring outreach/promoting social support, cognitive and behavioral skills (e.g., problem solving, distress tolerance), safety planning, and means restriction.…”
Section: Hindrances To Treatment Effectiveness For Suicidal Thoughts ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Idiographic approaches, which collect intensive longitudinal data from one individual and then develop a personalized statistical model (e.g., Fisher at al., 2017;Kaurin et al, 2022;Piccirillo & Rodebaugh, 2022), hold the potential to improve suicide prediction. Such approaches were also in accordance with the Fluid Vulnerability Theory of Suicide (Bryan et al, 2020), which conceptualizes suicide as an inherently dynamic construct that follows a nonlinear time course and differs drastically within an individual over time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%