2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-10-2419-1_21
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrating a Peer Evaluation Module in a Social Learning Platform

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 19 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, such an approach is likely to limit the effectiveness of learning during peer-assessment as a grade/mark alone may fail to diagnose strengths and developmental areas in the assessed work (Davies, 2006). As reported in (Popescu, 2017) peer review also has potential pitfalls, such as validity, reliability and fairness issues, especially in case of peer grading.…”
Section: Forms Of Assessment and Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, such an approach is likely to limit the effectiveness of learning during peer-assessment as a grade/mark alone may fail to diagnose strengths and developmental areas in the assessed work (Davies, 2006). As reported in (Popescu, 2017) peer review also has potential pitfalls, such as validity, reliability and fairness issues, especially in case of peer grading.…”
Section: Forms Of Assessment and Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%