2008
DOI: 10.1080/01431160801891838
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrating airborne SAR, Landsat TM and airborne geophysics data for improving geological mapping in the Amazon region: the Cigano Granite, Carajás Province, Brazil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, fine spatial resolution is beneficial, as it reduces the number of elements represented within a pixel, which enhances the unmixing results and thereby the detection of minerals. The spatial and spectral resolutions of Landsat TM and MODIS have been found to be too coarse for determining mineral composition (Dobos et al, 2000;Kettles et al, 2000;Teruiya et al, 2008). However, the combination of Landsat TM data and ASTER data has been useful because the general lithological variability is mapped with Landsat TM whereas ASTER maps the different mineral groups.…”
Section: Mineralogymentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Additionally, fine spatial resolution is beneficial, as it reduces the number of elements represented within a pixel, which enhances the unmixing results and thereby the detection of minerals. The spatial and spectral resolutions of Landsat TM and MODIS have been found to be too coarse for determining mineral composition (Dobos et al, 2000;Kettles et al, 2000;Teruiya et al, 2008). However, the combination of Landsat TM data and ASTER data has been useful because the general lithological variability is mapped with Landsat TM whereas ASTER maps the different mineral groups.…”
Section: Mineralogymentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Figures 3 and 4 clearly show that the upscaled image with a coarser spatial resolution achieved the lowest accuracy in all feature sets. This is because the nearest neighbor resampling not only loses the spatial details but also increases the proportion of mixed pixels by artificially combining four adjacent pixels into one, both of which have a detrimental effect on classification accuracy [67]. Figures 3 and 4 show clearly that based solely on spectral bands, the OA increased by 1.84% to 3.85% by different pansharpening algorithms compared to that of upscaling.…”
Section: Differences Between Upscaling and Downscalingmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The technique developed by Cloude and Pottier [27] considers that the information contained in the coherence matrix [T] is the result of the contribution of the three types of scattering mechanisms, in which each scattering is modeled by a canonical target represented by its scattering matrix , based on the expression: (5) where are the eigenvalues of and its related eigenvector. The relative importance of each scattering to the value of is given by the eigenvalue derived from the coherence matrix [27].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of radar images in geological surveys is a well-established procedure, and has been employed in several studies in the moist tropics, such as integrated, multisource data procedures [1][2][3][4][5], monoscopic and stereoscopic visual analysis [6], and digital classification based on textural attributes [7]. In all these cases, the data were analyzed based on the amplitude or intensity of the backscattered signal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%