Integrating Approaches Requires More Than a Division of Labor

Abstract

, J. (2006). Cross-cultural differences in physical aggression between partners: a socialrole analysis.

Benevolent Sexism and Mate Preferences: Why Do Women Prefer Benevolent Men Despite Recognizing That They Can Be Undermining?

“…Although sometimes treated as competing perspectives (e.g., Eagly & Wood, 1999; Wood & Eagly, 2002), several recent accounts have argued that social role theory and evolutionary perspectives should be integrated to produce coherent explanations of human sex differences (C. P. Cross & Campbell, 2017; Eagly & Wood, 2013; Gangestad, Haselton, & Buss, 2006).…”

“…Although sometimes treated as competing perspectives (e.g., Eagly & Wood, 1999;Wood & Eagly, 2002), several recent accounts have argued that social role theory and evolutionary perspectives should be integrated to produce coherent explanations of human BENEVOLENT SEXISM AND MATE PREFERENCES 28 sex differences (Cross & Campbell, 2017;Eagly & Wood, 2013;Gangestad, Haselton, & Buss, 2006). Moreover, this aim is in line with perspectives that reject fallacious natureversus-nurture dichotomies and seek instead to explain how evolved dispositions interact with socio-cultural influences to shape human psychology (e.g., Baumard & Boyer, 2013;Kenrick, Li & Butner, 2003;Mesoudi, 2009;Norenzayan, Schaller, & Heine, 2006;Sperber & Hirschfeld, 2004).…”

Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System Score Combined with the New Italian Classification for Thyroid Cytology Improves the Clinical Management of Indeterminate Nodules

“…Over the last years, major efforts have been made to generate new classification systems for thyroid cytology in order to ameliorate the diagnostic stratification of nodules with indeterminate cytology, a grey area of fine-needle aspiration cytology [23–28]. In particular, all the new systems have subcategorized the indeterminate lesions into two subclasses which are expected to correspond to different rate of malignancy.…”

“…In fact, in view of the relative low rate of malignancy of the AUS/FLUS, Thy 3a and TIR3A categories, follow-up of the patients and FNAC repetition is suggested. On the other hand, the relative high rate of malignancy observed in the FN/SFN, Thy 3f, and TIR3B recommends surgery as the preferential option [23–28]. However, a study from Brophy and colleagues, using the BTA-RCPath classification system on 151 Thy 3 nodules with histological diagnosis, found no difference in the malignancy rate of lesions classified as Thy 3a and Thy 3f [30].…”

“…In particular, in the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (BSRTC), indeterminate nodules have been subcategorized in atypia or follicular lesions of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS) and in follicular neoplasms or suspicious for follicular neoplasms (FN/SFN) which are expected to correspond to different rate of malignancy with different clinical action required [23]. In 2009, the British Thyroid Association-Royal College of Pathologists (BTA-RCPath) revised the previous British reporting system already in use in UK since 2007 along the lines of the BSRTC and split the Thy 3 category in Thy 3a and Thy 3f [28]. In 2014, the Italian Society for Anatomic Pathology and Cytology (SIAPEC) together with the Italian Thyroid Association (AIT) modified the previous thyroid cytology classification of 2007, by replacing the TIR3 class with two new subclasses, TIR3A and TIR3B [24–26].…”