2007
DOI: 10.1037/1931-3896.1.2.80
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrating art historical, psychological, and neuroscientific explanations of artists' advantages in drawing and perception.

Abstract: Art historians, artists, psychologists, and neuroscientists have long asserted that artists perceive the world differently than nonartists. Although empirical research on the nature and correlates of skilled drawing is limited, the available evidence supports this view: artists outperform nonartists on visual analysis and form recognition tasks and their perceptual advantages are correlated with and can be largely accounted for by drawing skill. The authors propose an integrative model to explain these results… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
110
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(117 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
7
110
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, when simultaneously entered in a regression model containing all five FFMQ subcales as individual predictors, together with the control variables (aesthetic fluency and sex), we found that Non-reactivity positively predicted aesthetic responses, and Non-judging negatively predicted aesthetic responses. In line with previous studies we found an expertise effect, where participants who were more knowledgeable about the arts in general reported more aesthetic experiences (Kozbelt & Seeley, 2007). In addition we found that music was the most frequently reported domain, also in agreement with previous studies .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, when simultaneously entered in a regression model containing all five FFMQ subcales as individual predictors, together with the control variables (aesthetic fluency and sex), we found that Non-reactivity positively predicted aesthetic responses, and Non-judging negatively predicted aesthetic responses. In line with previous studies we found an expertise effect, where participants who were more knowledgeable about the arts in general reported more aesthetic experiences (Kozbelt & Seeley, 2007). In addition we found that music was the most frequently reported domain, also in agreement with previous studies .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Expertise in art and music, and gender, have been found to influence the frequency of aesthetic responses (Kozbelt & Seeley, 2007); those scoring high in aesthetic expertise, and women, have reported relatively higher aesthetic experience scores .Together these studies provide strong evidence that individual differences influence the frequency of aesthetic responses to the arts. Nevertheless, this field of research remains in its infancy.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 49%
“…This should go some way to addressing the inconsistencies in previous research. In addition, we will be able to specifically address the issue of whether artists' advantages are predominantly a product of EXPERTS IN VISUAL COGNITION 9 top-down (Kozbelt & Seeley, 2007) or bottom-up (Cohen & Bennett, 1997) influences on visual perception.…”
Section: Experts In Visual Cognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, drawing or painting experience also affects retrieval of visual information and the level of accuracy and precision of realistic drawing. This suggests that the difference between a novice and an expert lies not only in drawing skills, but also in their cognitive abilities (e.g., Cohen & Bennett, 1997;Cohen & Jones, 2008;Kozbelt, 2001;Kozbelt & Seeley, 2007;Mitchell, Ropar, Ackroyd, & Rajendran, 2005;Schlewitt-Haynes, Earthman, & Burns, 2002). The literature indicates that previous drawing experience might have an impact on 2D positioning techniques; this study aims to confirm that correlation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 56%