1996
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1098-1063(1996)6:6<643::aid-hipo7>3.0.co;2-h
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrating behavioral and physiological models of hippocampal function

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Raaijmakers & Shi¡rin 1981) and between the stored record and the`header' by which it is referenced (Morton et al 1985). Other approaches to generating event codes have included using an e¤cient compression of the event representations (Gluck & Myers 1996) and endogenously generated temporally varying codes (Levy 1996). One idea to which we will return is that the hippocampal role in episodic memory might relate to the provision of the spatio-temporal context of the event (O'Keefe & Nadel 1978).…”
Section: A Generic Hippocampo-neocortical Model Of Long-term Memorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Raaijmakers & Shi¡rin 1981) and between the stored record and the`header' by which it is referenced (Morton et al 1985). Other approaches to generating event codes have included using an e¤cient compression of the event representations (Gluck & Myers 1996) and endogenously generated temporally varying codes (Levy 1996). One idea to which we will return is that the hippocampal role in episodic memory might relate to the provision of the spatio-temporal context of the event (O'Keefe & Nadel 1978).…”
Section: A Generic Hippocampo-neocortical Model Of Long-term Memorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Models could also incorporate multiple forms of neurotransmission such as GABAergic and acetylcholinergic systems, which control modes of oscillatory firing in the hippocampus during learning and memory consolidation (Buzsaki, 2001;Hasselmo et al, 2002). Simulations measuring the effects of independently variable rates of apoptosis vs neurogenesis should also be considered in the context of models accounting for cortical-hippocampal cooperation in the retention and retrieval of long-term memory (McClelland et al, 1995;Eichenbaum, 2000;Nadel et al, 2000), spatial memory (McNaughton et al, 1996;Burgess et al, 1998), temporal sequencing (Agster et al, 2002), classical conditioning, and novelty encoding (Gluck and Myers, 1996;Schmajuk et al, 2000).…”
Section: Future Directions In Network Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This assumption, in light of available in vivo evidence, led us to hypothesize that ongoing rates of neuronal turnover might be tuned to optimize future network learning according to the degree of novelty inherent to new contextual information presented to the learning system. The plausibility of this idea was reinforced by additional lines of evidence implicating the hippocampus in novelty recognition and encoding (Schmajuk, 2002;Gluck & Myers, 1996), where rates of neurogenesis may correlate with different behavioral responses to environmental novelty (Lemaire, Aurousseau, Le Moal, & Abrous, 1999). Thus, cortiocosteroids and other neural mediators of neurogenic regulation might be evoked with amplitudes or durations in proportion to the degree of stressfully novel environmental contextual change, appropriately preparing hippocampal networks for future learning demands of differential informational burdens.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%