2018
DOI: 10.1093/cdn/nzy068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrating Calcium Supplementation into Facility-Based Antenatal Care Services in Western Kenya: A Qualitative Process Evaluation to Identify Implementation Barriers and Facilitators

Abstract: BackgroundIn countries with low calcium intake, the WHO recommends integrating calcium supplementation into antenatal care (ANC) to reduce the risk of preeclampsia, a leading cause of maternal mortality. Current WHO guidelines recommend women take 3–4 calcium supplements plus 1 iron-folic acid supplement at separate times daily. There is limited evidence about implementing these guidelines through routine ANC. Through the Micronutrient Initiative-Cornell University Calcium (MICa) trial, we examined the effect … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our understanding of these interventions is further limited by the lack of process data describing attendance and coverage; fidelity of delivery; participant views on acceptability, quality, and relevance; and implementer views on feasibility. While a small number of studies explored these issues (Downs et al, 2019 ; Flax et al, 2019 ; Martin et al, 2015 , 2018 ; Nguyen et al, 2018 ; Salasibew et al, 2019 ; Tall et al, 2018 ) these gaps highlight the importance of utilizing reporting guidelines for social and behavioural interventions and related implementation research to ensure transparency and replicability (Yousafzai et al, 2018 ). In addition to examining the impact of interventions, it is also important to assess their implementation by evaluating intervention acceptability, adoption, appropriateness, cost, feasibility, fidelity and sustainability (Proctor et al, 2011 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our understanding of these interventions is further limited by the lack of process data describing attendance and coverage; fidelity of delivery; participant views on acceptability, quality, and relevance; and implementer views on feasibility. While a small number of studies explored these issues (Downs et al, 2019 ; Flax et al, 2019 ; Martin et al, 2015 , 2018 ; Nguyen et al, 2018 ; Salasibew et al, 2019 ; Tall et al, 2018 ) these gaps highlight the importance of utilizing reporting guidelines for social and behavioural interventions and related implementation research to ensure transparency and replicability (Yousafzai et al, 2018 ). In addition to examining the impact of interventions, it is also important to assess their implementation by evaluating intervention acceptability, adoption, appropriateness, cost, feasibility, fidelity and sustainability (Proctor et al, 2011 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and implementer views on feasibility. While a small number of studies explored these issues (Downs et al, 2019;Flax et al, 2019;Martin et al, 2015Martin et al, , 2018Nguyen et al, 2018;Salasibew et al, 2019;Tall et al, 2018) these gaps highlight the importance of utilizing reporting guidelines for social and behavioural interventions and related implementation research to ensure transparency and replicability (Yousafzai et al, 2018). In addition to examining the impact of interventions, it is also important to assess their implementation by evaluating intervention acceptability, adoption, appropriateness, cost, feasibility, fidelity and sustainability (Proctor et al, 2011 Kumar et al, 2018;Salasibew et al, 2019;Satzinger et al, 2009), cash transfer or food transfer (Hoddinott et al, 2018), parenting and early child development (Betancourt et al, 2020;Singla et al, 2015) and community development (Fiorella et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The qualitative data were collected through semi-structured interviews conducted between June and July 2019, four months after the completion of implementation. Interview topics were determined a priori, based on a literature review of similar studies and varied depending on the respondent type [23,24]. Topics included implementers' overall impression of the intervention, what went well and what did not in implementing the intervention components, and the context within which the intervention was implemented.…”
Section: Qualitative Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another study examined factors that influence calcium supplementation delivery and uptake of 32 pregnant women in Kenya 63 . It similarly showed that reminder materials and adherence partners (providing support to help with remembering to take the pills) improved adherence 68,69 . This study also recommended a consistent supply of supplements, high‐quality counseling from antenatal care providers, reminder materials for women to take home, and family support for the successful integration of calcium supplementation into antenatal care.…”
Section: Challenges In Implementing Prenatal Calcium Supplementation ...mentioning
confidence: 99%