2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.crm.2017.06.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrating climate change into hazard mitigation planning: Opportunities and examples in practice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The natural hazards mitigation policies are gaining a leading role in the climate change adaptation framework and disaster risk reduction [75][76][77]. Herein, we have presented a series of specific sites where distinct hydro-meteorological hazards are coped with NBSs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The natural hazards mitigation policies are gaining a leading role in the climate change adaptation framework and disaster risk reduction [75][76][77]. Herein, we have presented a series of specific sites where distinct hydro-meteorological hazards are coped with NBSs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Potential projects may include increasing the elevation of structures vulnerable to fl ooding; property acquisition for conversion to open space; fl ood control projects; wind or extreme temperature retrofi ts; and, similar projects that advance the resilience of infrastructure of the built environment. This is an area of increasing innovation that many extend to a variety of different novel Funding and financing adaptation 65 programmatic options ( Stults 2017 ). Table A.3 provides some potential opportunities for local governments to integrate climate change considerations for their own local hazard mitigation planning (LHMP) into the state hazard mitigation plan (SHMP) consistent with existing FEMA hazard mitigation planning requirements.…”
Section: Disaster Recovery Disaster Risk Reduction and Resiliencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Otherwise, an ANV council's approval of a plan that it may not have even read amounts to token participation. The resulting plan, passed without meaningful community input, may never be implemented [77,78,79].…”
Section: Improving External Entity Efforts To Collaboratementioning
confidence: 99%