2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2021.104676
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrating cultural and natural heritage approaches to Marine Protected Areas in the MENA region

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite engagement having a limited presence in the literature, several opportunities for meaningful engagement with local and Traditional stakeholders were identified. For example, Breen and colleagues (2021:8) suggest incorporating stakeholder values, describing a stage of the process to be “designed as a participatory, inclusive engagement process that address the knowledge, understandings, needs, and concerns of all parties associated either directly or indirectly with the [marine protected area].” Another example can be found in Dawson and colleagues (2021), who describe how collaboration can inform citizens of climate change impacts, make the decision-making process more transparent, and empower communities by giving them more tools and influence. Archaeological site stewards who integrate local and Traditional values and perspectives will work toward holistic site stewardship by weaving different knowledge systems and breaking down silos for cultural and natural resource management.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite engagement having a limited presence in the literature, several opportunities for meaningful engagement with local and Traditional stakeholders were identified. For example, Breen and colleagues (2021:8) suggest incorporating stakeholder values, describing a stage of the process to be “designed as a participatory, inclusive engagement process that address the knowledge, understandings, needs, and concerns of all parties associated either directly or indirectly with the [marine protected area].” Another example can be found in Dawson and colleagues (2021), who describe how collaboration can inform citizens of climate change impacts, make the decision-making process more transparent, and empower communities by giving them more tools and influence. Archaeological site stewards who integrate local and Traditional values and perspectives will work toward holistic site stewardship by weaving different knowledge systems and breaking down silos for cultural and natural resource management.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is particularly problematic in the light of the noted differences in site functions between the coast and the High Mountains Region. An incorporation of cultural heritage within the mission statements of these protectorates, as for example suggested by Breen et al ( 2021 ), could provide a broader inclusivity and local engagement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[19] suggest that marine protected areas (MPAs), such as Maritime Indigenous Protected Areas are very likely to protect critical habitats and cultural heritage sites, where their impact is convincing as a tool for improving fisheries management. The significance of taking historical sites into account while creating marine protected areas [20]. Further efforts are required to guarantee that present and prospective MPAs fulfill the twin objectives of conserving biodiversity and upholding the rights of Indigenous people [21].…”
Section: Determination Of the Type Of Maritime Conservation Areamentioning
confidence: 99%