Integrating disaster risk reduction and climate change adaptation: a systematic literature review

Islam, Shafiqul; Chu, Cordia; Smart, James C. R.; Liew, Leong H.

doi:10.1080/17565529.2019.1613217

Cited by 36 publications

(15 citation statements)

References 60 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…In the academic environment SLRs are quite diffused in many areas of investigation, especially in health research and biology, but they are becoming increasingly common in environmental studies on subjects such as climate change adaptation [20][21][22], water policy [23][24][25] and food security [26][27][28][29], although, to our knowledge, no SLR focuses on consumer behavioural aspects related to waste management through a holistic analysis of socio-demographical, psychological, cultural and environmental characteristics. For example, Ma and Hipel [16] concentrate on the social dimensions of municipal solid waste management; Almosa, et al [30] on social marketing in relation to littering behaviour; Schanes, et al [31] on specific waste like the household food, and Canali, et al [32] on food waste drivers.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Systematic Literature Review of Concepts and Factors Related to Pro-Environmental Consumer Behaviour in Relation to Waste Management Through an Interdisciplinary Approach

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Although there has been a steady increase in the number of studies on consumer behaviour in relation to sustainable development, there is limited focus on the product disposal phase. This systematic literature review intends to: (1) clarify how concepts related to pro-environmental consumer behaviour are understood and analysed in the academic literature on waste management; (2) discover any interplay between pro-environmental consumer behaviour and generic consumer behaviour, and the conditions and factors that favour it. A typical systematic literature review methodology was applied to the papers available on Web of Science, Science Direct and EBSCO (Elton Bryson Stephens Company) host between 1975 and 2019, leading to the selection of 699 final papers. The findings reveal that: (1) Although scholars tend to create a variety of pro-environmental consumer behaviour models depending on their specific field of inquiry, all approaches can be traced back to a limited number of reference theories; (2) The overall level of interplay between pro-environmental consumer behaviour and generic consumer behaviour is limited, nevertheless a favourable context or a supportive institutional-legal framework can significantly influence it; (3) A plethora of conditions and factors favour this type of interplay, involving social psychology, laws, economics, institutions and more; (4) Several critical issues appear in the analysed papers, especially some scholars’ assumptions to be able to identify all key factors. It follows the need for a more interdisciplinary approach, a deeper analysis of the effectiveness of the intervention measures at the governmental and institutional level, and a clear classification of factors and conditions (as proposed by this review).

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Systematic Literature Review of Concepts and Factors Related to Pro-Environmental Consumer Behaviour in Relation to Waste Management Through an Interdisciplinary Approach

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…To ensure reproducibility and transparency of our findings, this review follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) guidelines which is a scientific procedure that has been followed in the study by (Habiba, Shaw & Takeuchi 2012 ; Hezam & Nayeem 2021 ; Kumar et al 2021 ; Thurston et al 2021 ) unlike Matunhu, Mago and Matunhu ( 2022 ). The systematic approach has been applied to related studies and improves scientificity of the review (see, e.g., Djalante 2018 ; Estevão & Costa 2020 ; Islam et al 2020 ; Kalanlar 2021 ; Sohrabizadeh et al 2021 ; Suk et al 2020 ).…”

Section: Review Principles Materials and Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Natural hazard insurance demand: A systematic review

Mushonga

Mishi

2022

Jàmbá Journal of Disaster Risk Studies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The mitigation of natural hazard costs such as loss of property, life, crops and medical costs can be achieved through the adoption of insurance. It is, however, not clear whether there is corresponding demand for insurance given the increasing frequency and veracity of natural hazards, especially in South Africa. This study follows the guideline of Preferred Reporting items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) to identify the relevant works on the subject. A total of 645 articles emerged on initial search and after screening, 39 remained which have been reviewed in this study. Reviewing the studies and conflating with the study objectives, the following themes emerged for discussion on demand for natural hazard insurance, is there demand for natural hazard insurance?;psychology of decision-making; risk perception; risk preference and willingness to pay. The study found that studies of demand for insurance have identified that there is low demand for tailor-made insurance products for natural hazards. Further analysis of the demand revealed that normative and descriptive decision-making of buying natural hazard insurance is part of the psychological factors that determine demand. Whilst risk preference and perception have sub-attributes that affect their impact on demand such as experience, age and salience to natural hazards in communities. Whilst willingness to pay is also a broad concept which is analysed using both monetary and non-monetary factors in literature, the results also identified that there is a huge gap in literature in terms of studies that cover risk preference and perception in Africa and in the Southern African Development Community (SADC) region.

show abstract

“…Some previous studies have considered that CCA is a subset of disaster risk reduction and one of many processes within disaster risk reduction (Kelman 2015 ; Kelman et al 2015 ). This may not be the case, however, in many ways, disaster risk reduction and CCA have overlapping aims and involve similar kinds of intervention (Twigg 2015 ; Islam et al 2020 ). Therefore, many studies have suggested that addressing CCA and DRR together could be more beneficial (Clegg et al 2019 ), and various studies have also explored ways and barriers of integrating DRR with CCA, as well as mainstreaming both into development (Mitchell et al 2010 ; Florano 2015 ; Twigg 2015 ; Hore et al 2018 ; Mal et al 2018 ; Gabriel et al 2021 ).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Disaster Risk Reduction, Climate Change Adaptation and Their Linkages with Sustainable Development over the Past 30 Years: A Review

Wen

Wan

Ye³

et al. 2023

Int J Disaster Risk Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The severe damage and impacts caused by extreme events in a changing climate will not only make the sustainable development goals difficult to achieve, but also erode the hard-won development gains of the past. This article reviews the major impacts and challenges of disaster and climate change risks on sustainable development, and summarizes the courses and linkages of disaster risk reduction (DRR), climate change adaptation (CCA), and sustainable development over the past 30 years. Our findings show that the conceptual development of DRR actions has gone through three general phases: disaster management in the 1990s, risk management in the 2000s, and resilient management and development in the 2010s. Gradually, CCA has been widely implemented to overcome the adverse effects of climate change. A framework is proposed for tackling climate change and disaster risks in the context of resilient, sustainable development, indicating that CCA is not a subset of DRR while they have similarities and differences in their scope and emphasis. It is crucial to transform governance mechanisms at different levels, so as to integrate CCA and DRR to reduce disaster and climate change risks, and achieve safe growth and a resilient future in the era of the Anthropocene.

show abstract

Integrating disaster risk reduction and climate change adaptation: a systematic literature review

Cited by 36 publications

References 60 publications

A Systematic Literature Review of Concepts and Factors Related to Pro-Environmental Consumer Behaviour in Relation to Waste Management Through an Interdisciplinary Approach

A Systematic Literature Review of Concepts and Factors Related to Pro-Environmental Consumer Behaviour in Relation to Waste Management Through an Interdisciplinary Approach

Natural hazard insurance demand: A systematic review

Disaster Risk Reduction, Climate Change Adaptation and Their Linkages with Sustainable Development over the Past 30 Years: A Review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About