1984
DOI: 10.1111/j.1545-5300.1984.00023.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrating Family Therapy Training into Psychiatry Residency Programs: Policy Issues and Alternatives

Abstract: This article explicates policy issues and alternatives in the integration of family therapy training within general psychiatry residency programs. These issues include controversies about the definition of the field; elective versus required teaching; curriculum content; and when, where, and who should teach family therapy in this context. The article concludes with recommendation for further clarification of this training area.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ganahl et al (1985b) feel there has been an "inflated allegiance to particular schools" of family therapy on the part of family therapy trainees. Because time to present material in depth is often limited and because there is a tendency in academic settings to train students first as generalists, the academic model of family therapy training is likely to provide trainees with an eclectic sampling of various family therapy ideas and practices (Cooper et al, 1981; Sugarman, 1981; 1984). This is in contrast to some family therapy training institutes that teach a more focused and intensive version of family therapy.…”
Section: Strengths Of the Academic Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ganahl et al (1985b) feel there has been an "inflated allegiance to particular schools" of family therapy on the part of family therapy trainees. Because time to present material in depth is often limited and because there is a tendency in academic settings to train students first as generalists, the academic model of family therapy training is likely to provide trainees with an eclectic sampling of various family therapy ideas and practices (Cooper et al, 1981; Sugarman, 1981; 1984). This is in contrast to some family therapy training institutes that teach a more focused and intensive version of family therapy.…”
Section: Strengths Of the Academic Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although traditional graduate programs now are incorporating family therapy into their curricula, there is often more verbal support given than actual behavioral support (Liddle, 1978). There remains in many programs a resistance to new ways of thinking such as those proposed by systems theory (Sugarman, 1984). Consequently it is still usual for only one or several of the faculty to be family therapists (Cooper et al, 1981).…”
Section: Limitations Of the Academic Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%