Integrating fuzzy DEMATEL and fuzzy hierarchical TOPSIS methods for truck selection

Baykasoğlu, Adil; Kaplanoğlu, Vahit; Durmuşoğlu, Zeynep Didem Unutmaz; Şahin, Cenk

doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2012.05.046

Cited by 234 publications

(120 citation statements)

References 26 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

117

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Bulanık DEMATEL yöntemi, karmaşık bir yapıda olan etkilenen ve etkileyen faktörleri belirlemek için kullanılan yöntemlerden birisidir. Yöntemde faktörler sebep grubu ve etki grubu olmak üzere ikiye ayrılmaktadır [45]. Faktörlerin ikiye bölünmesi ile problemlerin planlanması ve çözümlenmesi sağlanmaktadır [57].…”

Section: Bulanık Dematel (Fuzzy Dematel)unclassified

Bulanık karar verme teknikleri ile CBS destekli konut memnuniyeti araştırması

Bostancı¹,

Bakır²,

Doğan³

et al. 2017

Gazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik-Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

:Konut memnuniyeti araştırmalarında genellikle anket uygulaması ve sonuçlarının değerlendirilmesine odaklanan çalışmaların varlığı dikkat çekmektedir. Ancak ankete dayalı bu çalışmaların mekânsal karşılıklarına yönelik modelleme eksikliği nedeni ile planlamada karar verme süreçlerine yönlendirici bir katkı sağlanamamaktadır. Bu çalışmada bulanık çok kriterli karar verme yöntemleri (Bulanık DEMATEL+Bulanık TOPSIS) kullanılarak, iki farklı TOKİ toplu konut bölgesinde konut memnuniyetinin değerlendirilmesine yönelik bir model oluşturulmuştur. Toplu konut bölgeleri arasındaki memnuniyeti etkileyen faktörler ve mekânsal karşılıklarına yönelik bulanık bir değerlendirme gerçekleştirilmiştir. Elde edilen sonuçlar ile her iki toplu konut bölgesi için geoistatistik analiz tabanlı ve Coğrafi Bilgi Sistemi (CBS) destekli karşılaştırılabilir konut memnuniyeti haritası oluşturulmuştur. Plan, tipoloji ve tasarım yaklaşımları aynı olan iki TOKİ bölgesinden Yenidoğan TOKİ bölgesinde konutlardan memnuniyet oranının %60 gibi yüksek bir oranda olduğu, buna karşılık İldem TOKİ bölgesinde ise memnuniyetin son derece düşük olduğu belirlenmiştir. Çalışma sonucunda konut memnuniyet düzeyindeki farklılığın temelde alanın yer seçimi üzerine odaklandığı, kent merkezi ile kurulan ilişkinin, ulaşım bağlantılarının güçlü etkenler olduğu gözlemlenmiştir. In housing satisfaction research, studies that focus on the evaluation of surveying and its results draw much attention. However, a guiding contribution cannot be made to the decision-making processes in planning due to the lack of modelling for the spatial provisions of these survey-based studies. This study was conducted using two multi-criteria decision-making methods (Fuzzy DEMATEL+ Fuzzy TOPSIS), and a model was created for the evaluation of housing satisfaction in two different TOKI housing estates. A fuzzy examination was carried out on the factors that affect satisfaction with the housing estates and their spatial provisions. A comparable housing satisfaction map based on a geostatistical analysis and supported with Geographic Information System was created for both housing estates using the obtained results. The planning, typology and design approaches of both TOKI housing estates are the same, but the level of the satisfaction with the houses in the Yenidoğan TOKI housing estate was found to be as high as 60%, while the level of satisfaction with the Ildem TOKI housing estate was found to be extremely low. The study concluded that this difference derived from site selection, and that relationships with the city centre and transportation corridors were determinant factors.

show abstract

Section: Bulanık Dematel (Fuzzy Dematel)unclassified

Bulanık karar verme teknikleri ile CBS destekli konut memnuniyeti araştırması

Bostancı¹,

Bakır²,

Doğan³

et al. 2017

Gazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik-Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This approach extends the fuzzy TOPSIS method to a hierarchical one and has been conducted by many researchers, also named as hierarchical fuzzy TOPSIS method [31][32][33]. This method inherits the hierarchy mechanism of AHP method and provides greater superiority to classical fuzzy TOPSIS methods [34,35]. The hierarchical fuzzy TOPSIS does not have the disadvantages of the pairwise comparisons among criteria, sub-criteria and alternatives, while it also simultaneously overcomes the disadvantages for the necessity to assign an initial weight in fuzzy TOPSIS [31].…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluating the Sustainability of Community-Based Long-Term Care Programmes: A Hybrid Multi-Criteria Decision Making Approach

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Sustainability is a crucial factor in Long-Term Care (LTC) programmes, which implies whether the programmes have the capability of sustaining a quality service over the long term. To evaluate the sustainability of community-based LTC programmes, a novel hybrid framework has been demonstrated with a mixed Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) technique. According to extensive literature review and the fuzzy Delphi method, four pillars of initial criteria and twelve sub-criteria have been determined. Then a weighted hierarchy has been constructed with Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to constitute the evaluation index system. In order to prove our framework, a case study of four community-based LTC programmes in Michigan is presented by applying the fuzzy technique for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution (TOPSIS) method. The results indicate that programme P2 has the best potential of sustainability, and sub-criteria associated with economy outweigh other sub-criteria. The sensitivity analysis verifies that the result of the ranking remains stable regardless of the fluctuation in sub-criteria weights, which proves the evaluation results and proposed model to be accurate and effective. This study develops a comprehensive and effective framework for evaluating community-based LTC programmes from the sustainability perspective.

show abstract

“…More to that, the Fuzzy DEMATEL is known as an extended technique for making better decisions under the fuzzy environment (Büyüközkan and Çifçi, 2012;Kuo, 2011;Abdullah and Zulkifli, 2015;Khorasaninejad et al 2016). The Fuzzy DEMATEL technique can be detailed as follows (Uygun et al 2015;Kuo, 2011;Baykasoğlu et al 2013;Najafinasab et al 2015;Yeh and Huang, 2014): org/10.15405/epsbs.2017.12.02.6 Corresponding Author: Hasan Dinçer Selection and peer-review under responsibility of the Organizing Committee of the conference eISSN: 2357-1330…”

Section: Analyses: Fuzzy Dematelmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The DEMATEL (decision making trial and evaluation laboratory) is a method originated by the Geneva Research Centre of the Battelle Memorial Institute (Baykasoğlu et al 2013). The use of the technique with the fuzzy sets theory provides the flexibility from the lack of knowledge under the uncertainty, imprecision and subjective information in case of the relationship of systems are generally presented with the crisp values in building a structural model.…”

Section: Analyses: Fuzzy Dematelmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation Of Brand Equity Using Balanced Scorecard: Evidence From Privatized Turkish Firms

Dınçer¹

2017

The European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Recent studies generally approach brand equity from a consumer oriented paradigm. Based on previous researches, the aim of this paper is to evaluate brand equity by a multidimensional perspective based on balanced scorecard approach. Besides consumer based aspect; financial, organizational, competition dimensions of brand equity are evaluated within a sample of privatized firms listed in Borsa Istanbul. For measuring brand equity, the study offers an original methodology of a hybrid multi-criteria decision making model designed for fuzzy environment. Thereby, the brand equity performances of the selected privatized firms are analyzed by using Fuzzy DEMATEL and Fuzzy VIKOR methods. The results of the analyses present that consumer based dimension is the most influential determinant of brand equity performance. Likewise, financial based dimension is found out to have effects on other brand equity dimensions. Finally, the study findings prove that firms privatized with a high-public-offeringshare have the best brand equity performance compared to others.

show abstract

Integrating fuzzy DEMATEL and fuzzy hierarchical TOPSIS methods for truck selection

Cited by 234 publications

References 26 publications

Bulanık karar verme teknikleri ile CBS destekli konut memnuniyeti araştırması

Bulanık karar verme teknikleri ile CBS destekli konut memnuniyeti araştırması

Evaluating the Sustainability of Community-Based Long-Term Care Programmes: A Hybrid Multi-Criteria Decision Making Approach

Evaluation Of Brand Equity Using Balanced Scorecard: Evidence From Privatized Turkish Firms

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About