2009
DOI: 10.1080/09540120802310957
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrating HIV clinical services into primary health care in Rwanda: a measure of quantitative effects

Abstract: Our results partially counter fears that HIV programs are producing adverse effects in non-HIV service delivery. Rather than leading to declines in other primary health care delivery, our findings suggest that the integration of HIV clinical services may contribute to increases.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
62
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
62
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This study, together with other work, suggests that the experience gained in providing HIVcare can and should inform efforts to strengthen national health systems as well as global health assistance strategies of the United States and other funders. [13][14][15][16]18,19 To this end, we suggest several policy directions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This study, together with other work, suggests that the experience gained in providing HIVcare can and should inform efforts to strengthen national health systems as well as global health assistance strategies of the United States and other funders. [13][14][15][16]18,19 To this end, we suggest several policy directions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11,17,18 Investments in laboratory services, including rebuilding and equipping laboratories and training laboratory staff, may have cross-service benefits. 25,26 Our previous research suggests that patients are strongly influenced by the perceived quality of facility equipment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another study in Rwanda finds that integrating basic HIV services into PHC clinics did not result in declines in other services (Price et al 2009). Instead, some other services saw improvements, especially reproductive health.…”
Section: General and Primary Healthcarementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is not out of context to then ask if door funding has strengthened the health care system of recipient countries. Contrary to this view, advocates of donor funding believe that these funding such as that in Rwanda has improved the infrastructure, management, communications, laboratories, information systems, and human resources as well as contributed to standardization of services, strengthened monitoring and surveillance systems of health systems [33][34][35]. However, while these proponents of donor funds make grand claims about its achievements and potential in Rwanda, an overview of the literature reveals that this evidence is little to support these claims if other contextual issues-such as those of vertical funding, social and political factors-within the different countries in the region are taken into cognizance.…”
Section: Utilization and Impactmentioning
confidence: 99%