Integrating mechanistic organism–environment interactions into the basic theory of community and evolutionary ecology

Abstract

SummaryThis paper presents an overview of how mechanistic knowledge of organism-environment interactions, including biomechanical interactions of heat, mass and momentum transfer, can be integrated into basic theoretical population biology through mechanistic functional responses that quantitatively describe how organisms respond to their physical environment. Integrating such functional responses into simple community and microevolutionary models allows scaling up of the organism-level understanding from biomechanics both ecologically and temporally. For community models, Holling-type functional responses for predator-prey interactions provide a classic example of the functional response affecting qualitative model dynamics, and recent efforts are expanding analogous models to incorporate environmental influences such as temperature. For evolutionary models, mechanistic functional responses dependent on the environment can serve as fitness functions in both quantitative genetic and game theoretic frameworks, especially those concerning function-valued traits. I present a novel comparison of a mechanistic fitness function based on thermal performance curves to a commonly used generic fitness function, which quantitatively differ in their predictions for response to environmental change. A variety of examples illustrate how mechanistic functional responses enhance model connections to biologically relevant traits and processes as well as environmental conditions and therefore have the potential to link theoretical and empirical studies. Sensitivity analysis of such models can provide biologically relevant insight into which parameters and processes are important to community and evolutionary responses to environmental change such as climate change, which can inform conservation management aimed at protecting response capacity. Overall, the distillation of detailed knowledge or organism-environment interactions into mechanistic functional responses in simple population biology models provides a framework for integrating biomechanics and ecology that allows both tractability and generality.

When is dispersal for dispersal? Unifying marine and terrestrial perspectives

“…Measuring dispersal distance in the field is often more difficult, but can also be explored in trait-based models of dispersal evolution . A trait-based approach that incorporates both direct and indirect selective agents will also be more mechanistic and therefore enhance predictability under novel environmental conditions (Helmuth, Kingsolver & Carrington, 2005;Baskett, 2012), which might be particularly important in the context of climate change given the significant role of dispersal in species responses to changing climatic conditions (Travis et al, 2013). (6) We join others before us (e.g.…”

Linking patterns and processes across scales: the application of scale-transition theory to algal dynamics on rocky shores

“…Similarly, one could build on mechanistic models to determine how the biomechanics underlying competitive or consumer-resource interactions (e.g. Baskett, 2012) translate local processes into largescale population dynamics. Thus, as far as nonlinear response functions are involved, STT can be used to scale up physiological to community-level processes (Denny and Benedetti-Cecchi, 2012).…”

A metabolic perspective on competition and body size reductions with warming

“…A general model sheds light on the proposed approach. Consider the Lotka–Volterra model of competition, where we have abstractly expressed the model parameters as functions of temperature, T : where i ≠ j and i , j = 1,2 (Baskett ). Here, is the density of competitor i , measures the strength of intraspecific competition, and measures the strength of interspecific competition.…”